mattihp
Registered User
Me too.The point mattihp is making I'm pretty sure is, that there's a rivalry of Fin/Swede and even as a Fin, mattihp is still picking Henrik.
At least that's how I took it.
Me too.The point mattihp is making I'm pretty sure is, that there's a rivalry of Fin/Swede and even as a Fin, mattihp is still picking Henrik.
At least that's how I took it.
And the time they played for a medal?
He's saying that even though Finns would have a reason to dislike Lundqvist because of the Swede/Finn rivalry, he still votes Lundqvist because it's that clear of a margin. LOL at you telling a guy who is saying he's Finnish that there's a difference. Pretty sure he knows.Sorry to disappoint you, but Lundqvist is Swedish.. Not Finnish. There's a difference.
Oh, good. I was wondering if the strong team narrative applied to both goalies or just when Price won.I would have won behind a stacked team Canada.
Lmao no it isn’t. The art Ross winner wasn’t even nominated for the Hart. It was a joke of a seasonThis is revisionist history.
Ovi scored 53 goals lmao “no competition for the Hart”
Oh, good. I was wondering if the strong team narrative applied to both goalies or just when Price won.
Lundqvist’s teams were far better?I love when people compare Price's stats to other goalies who had far better teams in front of them.
Using their 2 head to head matchups in the playoffs (one where price was injured) is not a fair comparison, because, as you pointed out, the quality of team in front of the goalie has an effect on the outcome.Your point being?