Lowest amount of shots on goal in playoff history

[Legionnaire11]

And what makes you think the Pens will ever get held to only 12 shots ever again?

The Pens franchise has had almost 300 playoff games and that was the lowest.

I'd bet my house that doesn't happen again.

Yes but every time they've played the Predators in the playoffs they've been held to 12

 

[desmondtootoo]

Keep repeating this fallacy and maybe It'll come true.
Which goal was the only one that was legit?

Guentzel. Nice shot.

The other 4 -

Freebie for the homeboys, cheap 5 on 3 that no decent ref ever craps out in a Final.

Freebie for the homeboys, seconds after an ignored interference.

Own goal.

Empty netter.

Great likelihood of winning when you get 4 gift goals, and complain the other team out of one.

 

[rick6668]

Guentzel. Nice shot.

The other 4 -

Freebie for the homeboys, cheap 5 on 3 that no decent ref ever craps out in a Final.

Freebie for the homeboys, seconds after an ignored interference.

Own goal.

Empty netter.

Great likelihood of winning when you get 4 gift goals, and complain the other team out of one.

Again, this is the same goal.

 

[TorstenFrings]

the Avs had 12 in a loss to the devils in 2001

Would still be tied for the least then.

 

[bobholly39]

Philly beat Washington in game 5 last year with 11shots on net

This isn't a record

 

[Zen Arcade]

It was basically game 6 of the WCF with Nashville on the other side. No one cared because Anaheim lost.

 

[SEALBound]

Guentzel. Nice shot.

The other 4 -

Freebie for the homeboys, cheap 5 on 3 that no decent ref ever craps out in a Final.

Freebie for the homeboys, seconds after an ignored interference.

Own goal.

Empty netter.

Great likelihood of winning when you get 4 gift goals, and complain the other team out of one.

I like this attitude. Keep that.

All that matters is the W.

 

[HamiltonNHL]

Guentzel. Nice shot.

The other 4 -

Freebie for the homeboys, cheap 5 on 3 that no decent ref ever craps out in a Final.

Freebie for the homeboys, seconds after an ignored interference.

Own goal.

Empty netter.

Great likelihood of winning when you get 4 gift goals, and complain the other team out of one.

Was that ever crappy.
I wish there was a way to prevent that situation ... i bet the refs weren't happy about awarding the 5 on 3 either.

 

[desmondtootoo]

Again, this is the same goal.

ummmmmmm....no...

2 minute 5 on 3 was two simultaneous preds penalties that virtually never happens, especially to alter the outcome of a finals game.

The missed but insanely blatant interference was on Crosby, which allowed a Pitt goal seconds after it was ignored.

2 different gifts to the Pens.

 

[desmondtootoo]

Was that ever crappy.
I wish there was a way to prevent that situation ... i bet the refs weren't happy about it went down either.

It's like hitting the victim of a penalty with embellishment...done to create an outcome, or avoid one.

It was done for a reason, based in a pre-set understanding.

It's an automatic goal, to give Crosby-Malkin-Kessel-Hornquist, 2 minutes of 5 on 3.

Especially for the "stick on the ass" which is 100% guesswork, gray area.

Done for effect.

 

[rick6668]

ummmmmmm....no...

2 minute 5 on 3 was two simultaneous preds penalties that virtually never happens, especially to alter the outcome of a finals game.

The missed but insanely blatant interference was on Crosby, which allowed a Pitt goal seconds after it was ignored.

2 different gifts to the Pens.

https://www.nhl.com/video/malkins-power-play-tally/t-277350912/c-52095303

You are confused.

https://www.nhl.com/video/sheary-buries-one-time-goal/t-277350912/c-52095403

Unless you think that was Crosby "Interference" on the second video.

Wow 2 different "gifts" on the same goal means 2 goals shouldn't count.

ummmmmmmmmm....yes...