That's not only NHL scouts though. I'm not saying they are right or wrong, just reporting the facts of how White was perceived for this draft class.
Oh and if stats BEFORE the draft are really that important, then you don't draft Pinto, Formenton, Batherson, etc. It's all about what a team project a young player to become. No team should draft for what the player is at the moment of the draft, but a few years down the road.
I specifically mentioned NHL scouts because as an "internet scout", I think it is self-evident that I would respect other "internet scouts" and scouting services to some extent.
I understand how White was perceived. I know he had mono, and he did not receive primary offensive usage. These factors may have impacted his offensive numbers; however, I am going to let another team select him. That team can hope those reasons are true. I am not going to risk it. I'll take a player that had good numbers with no excuses needed.
The above is not really important. The main reason I am responding to you is because of your Pinto claim. Selecting a PPG+ USHL player in the second round is a fine pick. Off the top of my head, I think the only two players that were clearly stronger statistical players were Bobby Brink and Arthur Kaliyev. I'm not suggesting to always select the strongest statistical player, but every player taken should have a good statistical profile relative to draft position
Who are you referring to with the "etc"? From 2009-now, our late-round steals would likely be considered to be Hoffman, Stone, Dzingel, and Pageau. They are all strong statistical picks, so I am confused on who you are talking about. You pointed out two players that have more or less done nothing at the NHL level.
You claim no team should draft for the present. A team should draft for the future. I agree, and I never suggested otherwise.