Line Combos: Line Combinations & Point Projections - Early Edish

Do we have a snowball's chance in hell of making the playoffs


  • Total voters
    57

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,444
11,117
Welp.
This is probably it for this roster. Prospect camp has started, and main camp is right around the corner.

Let's see how good people's crystal balls are or how pro they are at putting together this rag tag group of mediocre talent.

IN THIS THREAD:

Post you 2021-2022 Flames opening night roster.
Post the points each player will have in brackets beside their name.
For goalies, games, wins, SV%

Mock for copying based solely on cap and last year's points; reminder that was a shortened season, if you're looking to make a full year comparison for most player, multiply by 1.46.

Matthew Tkachuk (43) - Sean Monahan (28) - Johnny Gaudreau (49)
Milan Lucic (23) - Mikael Backlund (32) - Blake Coleman (31)
Andrew Mangiapane (32) - Elias Lindholm (47) - Dillon Dube (22)
Trevor Lewis (10) - Brad Richardson (4) - Tyler Pitlick (16)
Brett Ritchie (8)

Noah Hanifin (15) - Rasmus Andersson (21)
Nikita Zadorov (8) - Chris Tanev (12)
Juuso Valimaki (11) - Erik Gudbranson (4)
Oliver Kylington (1) - Mike Stone (4)

Jacob Markstrom (43G, 22W, 0.904 SV%)
Dan Vladar (5G, 2W, 0.866 SV%)
 

InfinityIggy

Zagidulin's Dad
Jan 30, 2011
36,087
12,866
59.6097709,16.5425901
Matthew Tkachuk (73) - Sean Monahan (80) - Johnny Gaudreau (103)
Milan Lucic (21) - Mikael Backlund (44) - Blake Coleman (46)
Andrew Mangiapane (49) - Elias Lindholm (73) - Dillon Dube (42)
Trevor Lewis (8) - Brad Richardson (7) - Tyler Pitlick (12)
Brett Ritchie (29)

Noah Hanifin (34) - Rasmus Andersson (41)
Nikita Zadorov (14) - Chris Tanev (20)
Juuso Valimaki (22) - Erik Gudbranson (5)
Oliver Kylington (0) - Mike Stone (9)

Jacob Markstrom (69G, 43W, 0.915 SV%)
Dan Vladar (13G, 8W, 0.901 SV%)
 

Mobiandi

Registered User
Jan 17, 2015
21,037
17,464
Matthew Tkachuk (71) - Sean Monahan (38) - Johnny Gaudreau (91)
Milan Lucic (25) - Mikael Backlund (48) - Blake Coleman (33)
Andrew Mangiapane (42) - Elias Lindholm (75) - Dillon Dube (43)
Trevor Lewis (11) - Brad Richardson (7) - Tyler Pitlick (12)
Brett Ritchie (3)

Noah Hanifin (30) - Rasmus Andersson (32)
Nikita Zadorov (13) - Chris Tanev (14)
Juuso Valimaki (22) - Erik Gudbranson (3)
Oliver Kylington (0) - Mike Stone (7)

Jacob Markstrom (69G, 41W, 0.909 SV%)
Dan Vladar (13G, 4W, 0.887 SV%)
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,444
11,117
You guys can also move around the roster to represent the lines as you seem fit.
 

Darth Vladar

Registered User
Sep 10, 2021
1,098
505
Johnny (89) - Lindy (81) - Chucky (80)
Mangi (69) - Dube (44) - Coleman (65)
Mony (48) - Backs (42) - Lucic (28)
Lewis (?) - Richardson (12) - Pitlick (?)
Ritchie (?)

Hanifin (41) - Ras (35)
Vali (22) - Tanev (18)
Zad (14) - Guddy (4)
Kylington (8) - Stone (6)

Markstrom (70G, 39W, 0.923 SV%)
Darth Vladar (12G, 6W, 0.899 SV%)

EDIT: I updated my lines to put Mony on the 3rd line with Backs and Lucic, and adjusted my projected point totals accordingly. I suddenly don't mind that lineup, but if anyone gets hurt for any extended period of time, we're pretty much f*cked lol.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Hoxville

Ace Rimmer

Stoke me a clipper.
With little to no thought behind it (as per usual when I post) here's mine.

Gaudreau (79) - Lindholm (71) - Tkachuk (74)
Mangiapane (49) - Monahan (62) - Coleman (48)
Pelletier (23) - Backlund (42) - Dube (31)
Lucic (22) - Richardson (12) - Pitlick (12)
x Ritchie, Lewis

Hanifin (34) - Tanev (24)
Valimaki (21) - Andersson (28)
Zadorov (144 pim) - Gudbranson (873 icings)
x Kylington (popcorn flavoured tears) Stone (lol tenure)

Markstrom (52 gs, 34 wins, 0.916 sv%)
Darth Vladar (30 gs, 14 wins, 0.901 sv%)
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,900
15,766
Calgary
What I hope for:

Gaudreau(80)-Lindholm(68)-Tkachuk(72)
Dube(38)-Monahan(49)-Phillips (41)
Mangiapane(50)-Backlund(47)-Coleman (39)
Lucic(18)-Richardson/lewis/gawdin(15)-Pitlick(16)

Hanifin(32)-Andersson (35)
Valimaki(26)-Tanev (15)
Zadorov(11)-Mackey (19)

What I expect:

Gaudreau(80)-Lindholm(68)-Tkachuk(71)
Mangiapane(44)-Monahan(52)-Coleman (41)
Dube(38)-Backlund(47)-Pitlick (25)
Lucic (18)-Richardson(15-)Lewis/Ritchie (12)

Hanifin(36)-Tanev (15)
Zadorov (12)-Andersson (28)
Valimaki (21)-Gudbrandson (9)

The first lineup is better, but we need to be big and Canadian.
 
Last edited:

Johnny Hoxville

The Return of a Legend
Jul 15, 2006
37,549
9,343
Calgary
With little to no thought behind it (as per usual when I post) here's mine.

Gaudreau (79) - Lindholm (71) - Tkachuk (74)
Mangiapane (49) - Monahan (62) - Coleman (48)
Pelletier (23) - Backlund (42) - Dube (31)
Lucic (22) - Richardson (12) - Pitlick (12)
x Ritchie, Lewis

Hanifin (34) - Tanev (24)
Valimaki (21) - Andersson (28)
Zadorov (144 pim) - Gudbranson (873 icings)
x Kylington (popcorn flavoured tears) Stone (lol tenure)

Markstrom (52 gs, 34 wins, 0.916 sv%)
Darth Vladar (30 gs, 14 wins, 0.901 sv%)

Good job on this!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ace Rimmer

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
33,710
30,017
Gaudreau (106) - Lindholm (85) - Tkachuk (89)
Mangiapane (55) - Backlund (52) - Coleman (42)
Monahan (40) - Dube (38) - Pitlick (27)
Lucic (19) - Richardson (21) - Lewis (17)
 

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
34,325
54,302
Weegartown
Gaudreau is in a contract year. Imagine he plays pretty focused. So is Tkachuk for that matter. Markstrom bounces back, Monahan does to some extent, Hanifin proves he can run the PP.

Johnny Gaudreau (94) - Elias Lindholm (76) - Matthew Tkachuk (69)
Andrew Mangiapane (54) - Sean Monahan (58) - Blake Coleman (49)
Milan Lucic (24) - Mikael Backlund (46) - Dillon Dube (36)
Brad Richardson (24) - Trevor Lewis (14) - Tyler Pitlick (24)
Brett Ritchie (16), Matthew Phillips(9)

Noah Hanifin (42) - Rasmus Andersson (36)
Juuso Valimaki (26) - Chris Tanev (22)
Nikita Zadorov (13) - Erik Gudbranson (7)
Oliver Kylington (9) - Mike Stone (6)

Jacob Markstrom (64GP, 39W, 0.922 SV%)
Dan Vladar (18GP, 11W, 0.914 SV%)
 

DFF

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
22,319
6,567
Gaudreau (80) Monahan (55) Coleman (50)
Mangi (48) Lindholm (72) Tkachuk (70)
Lucic (30) Backlund (42) Dube (35)
Pitlick (18) Richardson (15) Lewis (12)

Hanifin (42) Tanev (21)
Zadorov (12) Andersson (28)
Valimaki (18) Gudbranson (10)

Markstrom (40 wins, .910, 2.89)
Vladar (3wins, .895, 3.25)
 

Darth Vladar

Registered User
Sep 10, 2021
1,098
505
Wasn't that last year?

I mean, I suppose he was on pace for 46 points in a full season. Is that "breakout" for us?

I can see Mangi and Coleman clicking on a line together and racking up points. I might actually change my line-up projections to have Dube in between them.

I've seen Dube listed as every single forward position. I don't know how often he was utilized as a center last season, but fwiw he took 13 faceoffs and won 8 of them. That could be a killer line, actually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tkachuk Norris

Corpus X

Wearing Stanley's cup.
May 24, 2014
3,777
3,102
Calgary
Not putting Sean Monahan in a position to score, a lot, is destroying his trade value and terrible asset management. He goes on the top line with Johnny and Coleman who both can dish to him. Putting him anywhere else, when people want him traded for something of value, is an Oiler move.

Johnny - Mony - Coleman
Tkachuk/Mangi - Lindholm - Mangi/Tkachuk
Lucic/Backlund/Dube
Pitlick/Lewis/Ritchie

Hanifin/Tanev
Zadorov/Anderson
Valimaki/Stone

Wolf
Nobody else is needed...
or
Markstrom
Vladar
 

Darth Vladar

Registered User
Sep 10, 2021
1,098
505
Not putting Sean Monahan in a position to score, a lot, is destroying his trade value and terrible asset management. He goes on the top line with Johnny and Coleman who both can dish to him. Putting him anywhere else, when people want him traded for something of value, is an Oiler move.

Johnny - Mony - Coleman
Tkachuk/Mangi - Lindholm - Mangi/Tkachuk
Lucic/Backlund/Dube
Pitlick/Lewis/Ritchie

Hanifin/Tanev
Zadorov/Anderson
Valimaki/Stone

Wolf
Nobody else is needed...
or
Markstrom
Vladar

Assuming the plan is indeed to showcase him, then you'd probably do well to surround him with the best players possible to increase the chance of boosting his value, but that strategy could actually lower his value if he ends up being dead weight. You can put Mony is a position to score all you want, it doesn't mean he will. Playing with dependable vets like Backs and Looch could actually result in Mony playing a more balanced, reliable game, making him a more valuable piece for a contender (if our own season ends up being a write-off) than he would being carried in the top-six. I could see Mangi/Dube/Coleman and Mony/Backs/Looch being something more like a 2A/2B scenario, with either line capable of checking duties.
 

Gritty

Registered User
Nov 28, 2011
7,474
175
Johnny (75) - Mony (53) - Coleman (49)
Tkachuk (69) - Lindholm (61) - Mangi (45)
Lucic (22) - Backlund (48) - Dube (39)
Richardson (14)- Lewis (15) - Pitlick (17)

Hanifin (42) -Tanev (18)
Zadorov (12) - Anderson (38)
Valimaki (20) - Stone (11)
Gudbranson (3)

Markstrom
Vladar
 

RasmusAndersson

Registered User
Oct 19, 2013
2,457
804
Not putting Sean Monahan in a position to score, a lot, is destroying his trade value and terrible asset management. He goes on the top line with Johnny and Coleman who both can dish to him. Putting him anywhere else, when people want him traded for something of value, is an Oiler move.

Johnny - Mony - Coleman
Tkachuk/Mangi - Lindholm - Mangi/Tkachuk
Lucic/Backlund/Dube
Pitlick/Lewis/Ritchie

Hanifin/Tanev
Zadorov/Anderson
Valimaki/Stone

Wolf
Nobody else is needed...
or
Markstrom
Vladar

I mean depends if the goal is to win hockey games or to salvage Money's value. If you are solely focused on trying to up his trade value then sure, continue to tie him to Gaudreau and inflate his point totals. But if you wanna put out a roster that gives us the best chance to win he should be nowhere near Gaudreau on our 1st line that will consistently face the top players on opposing teams.

Sure if we're struggling and need a spark put them back together for a period, or try him with Gaudreau and Coleman for a preseason game and maybe the chemistry is undeniable, but constructing our roster around protecting Monahan's trade value is misguided and not the best for our team as a whole imo. Maaaaybe if we're really trying to move Monahan so we throw him on Johnny's line for the first two weeks of the year or right before the deadline I would understand, but only in those specific cases and not long term.

Monahan still should be on the PP, probably PP1. But he should not be on the top-line 5v5. It's not fair to Johnny
 

Corpus X

Wearing Stanley's cup.
May 24, 2014
3,777
3,102
Calgary
I mean depends if the goal is to win hockey games or to salvage Money's value. If you are solely focused on trying to up his trade value then sure, continue to tie him to Gaudreau and inflate his point totals. But if you wanna put out a roster that gives us the best chance to win he should be nowhere near Gaudreau on our 1st line that will consistently face the top players on opposing teams.

Sure if we're struggling and need a spark put them back together for a period, or try him with Gaudreau and Coleman for a preseason game and maybe the chemistry is undeniable, but constructing our roster around protecting Monahan's trade value is misguided and not the best for our team as a whole imo. Maaaaybe if we're really trying to move Monahan so we throw him on Johnny's line for the first two weeks of the year or right before the deadline I would understand, but only in those specific cases and not long term.

Monahan still should be on the PP, probably PP1. But he should not be on the top-line 5v5. It's not fair to Johnny

Monahan plays well healthy. People are placing his injured play with his healthy play and creating a narrative to support a contrarian view. When Monahan plays like poo when he is healthy I'll entertain these discussions. Until then... I shall do what I came here to do since I came out of that toaster, continue to save lives.

download.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Hoxville

DomBarr

Registered User
Apr 7, 2014
2,754
900
They have a 50/50 chance but I picked
Peel my eyes out before I watch this trainwreck.
because the line up as is with Sutter coaching has a chance BUT this is a slow team that will NOT be exciting or interesting to watch at all...
 

Yepthatsme

Registered User
Oct 25, 2020
1,457
1,473
Gaudreau(81)-Lindholm(77)-Tkachuk(84)
Mangiapane(56)-Monahan(63)-Coleman(49)
Dube(36)-Backlund(43)-Pitlick/Phillips(20/28)
Lucic(20)-whoever(15)-whoever(12)

Hanifin(53)-Andersson(36)
Valimaki(24)-Tanev(18)
Zadorov(13)-Gudbranson/Mackey(4/12)

Notes
-Hanifin paced for 45 points once Ward was fired and brought his inability to use our D with him. With Gio’s power play time being distributed to both Hanifin and Anderson likely, I see him (and Andersson) ‘breaking out’ on the scoreboard
-Tkachuk with fans in the stands, in a contract year, and with something to prove leads our team on the ice and in points. Leading to being re-signed and getting the C.
-that top line has to be absolutely dominant to stay together, and that’s at both ends of the ice. We can’t waste our 3 best forwards being on the same line if they don’t completely out score and tilt the ice against their competition nightly. To everyone’s chagrin, Gaudreau should be put with Monahan and Coleman if it doesn’t work, or maybe Tkachuk-Monahan-Coleman for a Sutter-esque line
-Dube struggled as a top 6 wing last year, I don’t think he’s ready to be a centre until he strengthens up, and he definitely is not ready to be a top 6C.
-Defence pairs are based on Valimaki taking a big step in camp and showing lots of improvement, if not we see something that looks like the following and we will be much worse for it:

Hanifin-Tanev
Zadorov-Andersson
Valimaki-Gudbranson/Mackey
 
Last edited:

Mobiandi

Registered User
Jan 17, 2015
21,037
17,464
If Kylington can't make it on the team, I want to see Kinnvall. After Coronato, he's the prospect I'm most excited for

 

DFF

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
22,319
6,567
I mean depends if the goal is to win hockey games or to salvage Money's value. If you are solely focused on trying to up his trade value then sure, continue to tie him to Gaudreau and inflate his point totals. But if you wanna put out a roster that gives us the best chance to win he should be nowhere near Gaudreau on our 1st line that will consistently face the top players on opposing teams.

Sure if we're struggling and need a spark put them back together for a period, or try him with Gaudreau and Coleman for a preseason game and maybe the chemistry is undeniable, but constructing our roster around protecting Monahan's trade value is misguided and not the best for our team as a whole imo. Maaaaybe if we're really trying to move Monahan so we throw him on Johnny's line for the first two weeks of the year or right before the deadline I would understand, but only in those specific cases and not long term.

Monahan still should be on the PP, probably PP1. But he should not be on the top-line 5v5. It's not fair to Johnny


Problem is fit. Monahan really doesn’t fit anywhere without Johnny

If the Johnny/Monahan combo works, they have 2 good lines. If you split them, you only have one good line

The solution is to trade Monahan but that didn’t and won’t happen until he produces again
 

viper0220

Registered User
Oct 10, 2008
8,659
3,607
Problem is fit. Monahan really doesn’t fit anywhere without Johnny

If the Johnny/Monahan combo works, they have 2 good lines. If you split them, you only have one good line

The solution is to trade Monahan but that didn’t and won’t happen until he produces again


This is a major problem and it is true. Monahan needs to be carried like a baby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFF

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad