I mean look, I hated that Howden played over Andersson and complained about it dating to Howden's rookie year. Howden isn't good at much and shouldn't be used in anything more than a fourth line capacity.
That said, the fact that he played the role he did made you wonder--or rather, the fact that Andersson played the role that he did made you wonder. We know from how they handled Tony DeAngelo, just because you might be more talented, doesn't mean you'll play. You have to play the way they want, and practice the way they want, and carry yourself the way they want. Now we've seen Andersson throw a temper tantrum and quit; was that kind of temperament evident to the coaches? Did they play Howden ahead of him because Howden is the consummate team-first guy and Andersson showed some concerning traits? Seems kind of likely, at this point.