DAChampion
Registered User
- May 28, 2011
- 29,816
- 20,970
Braveheart was actually... a bit kind to Edward II.
But what's actually propagandized (?) in King's Speech?
It's part of the general Hollywood picture that WW2 was won due to the British and the Americans alone. It focuses on the British royalty. The Imitation Game was much worse. The impression the movie gives was that George's overcoming of his stutter was a key moment in WWII. It was not.
More specifically the role of Winston Churchill is utterly ridiculous and false. It's completely made up. He's not earned by the movie's plot, he just shows up at the end like a genie and does things in the movie not earned by the movie and which he did not do in real life. They do this because Churchill is worshipped in popular mythology, so in a way the movie exacerbates said popular mythology. They made history less interesting in the process. It was a cheap narrative trick to increase audience investment.
Writer's room:
"World war two, England, how can we make it more meaningful to the audience?"
"Let's bring in Winston Churchill and have him say things that the plot demands !!!!"