I mean you have to be joking. Or maybe you don't realize your bias.
If the leafs' defense let a pass get across the crease to a man standing in the crease, and let that guy turn and shoot that puck against a goalie coming across as quick as he can, the defense would be getting brutalized for their awful play.
He shot that literally from inside the crease. at a goalie moving post to post. with the dman doing nothing to impede the shot.
I'm not sure many of us are "satisfied", I know I'm not. I just think that so many of our guys are playing below their capabilities so it's not fair to single out one player. I know the goalie's mistakes are the most visible but still, people should know better. Around the same time last year many wanted to ship him out of town and he was pretty great the rest of the way, now he's a bum again?
All goalies go through slumps. Period. I'm not too worried myself and I am confident he'll turn it around.
Well, that's mostly because the bolded isn't true.I wonder why the Reimer haters are giving Andersen a free pass bc of the defense, even though it's 10 times better than any defense Reimer played in front of? The bias and lengths people are going to defend this mediocre goalie who we paid to be an upgrade is getting pathetic
Dictionary.com/hyperboleWell, that's mostly because the bolded isn't true.
i wanted vegas to score after that clearAnderson definitely did step up in OT.
However, the 3rd goal should've been his. Plus, he almost blew it all in OT with that bad clear.
Well, that's mostly because the bolded isn't true.
The 1st 2 were unlucky goals. However not surprising a certain someone still blames him for those goals. If it was red light Reimer? Probably not.
3rd one was bad and there is no excuse for that. An NHL starter needs to stop that. However after allowing that goal, you better make some big saves and he did.
Andersen won us the game after that 3rd goal.
well he managed to make a couple of big time saves as good as any Freddy made, didn't let in stinkers, and all three leaf goals came from point blank chances in the crease so.....not so bad for an ECHL goalie.
I can't believe the amount of flack Freddy gets -- just ridiculous. I don't know what game some of you watched but except for that 3rd goal, I thought he played one of his best game last night. Shut the door in SO, made great saves while he stood on his head and gave the team a chance to win which they did.
I made a huge mistake and re-lived the final moments of Game 7 just now to remind myself how much better Reimer truly is over Freddy -- you've no idea what soft goals are until you witness the disaster. It just proved all over again the reason the Leafs shipped him out. I can only imagine what would've been like if Freddy was in net that game..
if someone wants to make the claim that Andersen is screwed by bad defense more than Reimer (or even as much), there is something very wrong thereyou sure?
5v5 CA/60 (Adj) since 10/11
1. 17/18 48.3
2. 15/16 48.9
3. 16/17 50.4
4. 11/12 51.1
5. 14/15 52.7
6. 10/11 54.5
7. 12/13 55.1
8. 13/14 57.3
I don't believe there are two seperate rules. I think for the goal they use the crossbar as an easy height reference since it's stationary.So I'm not digging through this entire thread, but to my understanding...JVR's goal should have counted?
A high stick infraction needs to be above the players shoulders on a pass, or above the crossbar on a goal.
Since JVR's stick was below his shoulders and it was a pass to Bozak...that should have counted.
Am I wrong?
I don't believe there are two seperate rules. I think for the goal they use the crossbar as an easy height reference since it's stationary.
It wasn't the hyperbole that was the issue.Dictionary.com/hyperbole
Amount of shots doesn't affect save percentage. Except that some claim that more shots make it easier for the goaltender to get good numbers.you sure?
5v5 CA/60 (Adj) since 10/11
1. 17/18 48.3
2. 15/16 48.9
3. 16/17 50.4
4. 11/12 51.1
5. 14/15 52.7
6. 10/11 54.5
7. 12/13 55.1
8. 13/14 57.3
I think there are two interpretations of the same rule depending where on the ice you are.I was told their are two. Maybe I need to dig up the actual rules for this.
I wonder why the Reimer haters are giving Andersen a free pass bc of the defense, even though it's 10 times better than any defense Reimer played in front of? The bias and lengths people are going to defend this mediocre goalie who we paid to be an upgrade is getting pathetic
Pathetic "its never my fault" Reimer played in front of a better defence and always led the team to a callapse. If your a good goalie in this league, you stop a beachball in game 7 in last 10 minutes but he couldnt.
Its maddening how many excuse this mediocre callapser, and say "no no he smiles, its the team. This guy had 0 mental approach. No wonder he was called Red Light Reimer.
Andersen is a good goalie who plays in front of a worse defence, and doesnt callapse. He also doesnt fool people with a smile in his post game.
The Reimer club just cant accept 31 teams dont believe he is an NHL starter. Why so much loving affection for a smiling goalie?
Reimer and Andersen are both mediocre goalies. The difference is we gave up a 1st and more money to get Andersen because he was supposed to be an upgrade. He isn'tI know why do people keep defending Mediocre goalie Reimer. Its getting pathetic.
Looks like Florida has had enough of callapser Red light pathetic, hoorendous mental approach Reimer
Reimer and Andersen are both mediocre goalies. The difference is we gave up a 1st and more money to get Andersen because he was supposed to be an upgrade. He isn't
Umm....why?i wanted vegas to score after that clear