26Mats
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2018
- 32,324
- 24,812
[tweet]
Not understanding why agostino plays with plebs a d byron and scherbak plays with dlr. Makes no sense.
I would have liked to have seen scherbak with drouin and kotkaniemi
[tweet]
The Leafs definitely don't have a great defense. Theyre just more mobile and the key guys are younger for the most part.I rest my case. No matter how any one of us spin things to what we think, it's close and if the Habs D is average at best, the Leafs are not that much better.
They actually have a #1 in Morgan Rielly. And Marc Bergevin adores and covets him like a Taylor Swift fangirl.The Leafs definitely don't have a great defense. Theyre just more mobile and the key guys are younger for the most part.
Indeed.
Didn't we give up Pateryn and a fourth to acquire him?
Yuck...i'd rather have Simon Despres than Nathan Beaulieu.I disagree. When healthy...
Mete / Weber
Reilly / Petry
Beaulieu / Juulsen
Schlemko
Puck mobility skills is much better with this group! It was a major problem last season
If we kept Beaulieu and Emelin, Would we have gone after Alzner? .
Protecting Benn lead to series of unfortunate events in the summer of 17
Trying to prop him up before he gets waived?Then why has Julien consistently put Benn with petty. It seems he wants that pair to be a thing
Trying to prop him up before he gets waived?
Either way, last practice, Reilly was playing with Petry and I think that's the plan heading into this season.
I said it way back in the summer...i'll be shocked if Benn is on the opening roster.
Liljegren isnt in the NHL yet so I won't count him. But you forgot Gardiner on the Leafs and I guess Reilly for us.
I would make it:
Weber = Rielly (with Rielly overtaking Weber by next season IMO)
Petry > Zaitsev
Alzner < Hainsey (Hainsey makes less mistakes)
Mete </= Dermott
Reilly << Gardiner
Juulsen ?? Ozhiganov (don't know much about Ozhiganov)
Liljegren and Sandin coming up for the Leafs beats our guys as well IMO.
Gardiner definitely has a lot of questionable plays but he is not awful defensively for the most part. When he screws up, he screws up bad but he is not a power play specialist. He is a top 4 D on most NHL teams.I don't really know how good Reilly is yet (habs) but Gardiner is junk. He's earned the nickname Gardiner Express Way, named after a highway in Toronto, for good reason. He's an absolute disaster defensively. Don't let the points fool you, he is not good. He's M.A Bergeron level bad.
Gardiner definitely has a lot of questionable plays but he is not awful defensively for the most part. When he screws up, he screws up bad but he is not a power play specialist. He is a top 4 D on most NHL teams.
Yuck...i'd rather have Simon Despres than Nathan Beaulieu.
Not a fan at all, never have been.
Next season, he'll be the one signing a PTO with some team
3rd pairing at best. Just too many mental lapses per game that cost the leafs a goal. His risk far outweighs the reward. He's simply too easy to expose as we saw in the Boston series last year. Maybe having an elite defensive dman with him could hide some of his flaws but the leafs don't have any of those.Gardiner definitely has a lot of questionable plays but he is not awful defensively for the most part. When he screws up, he screws up bad but he is not a power play specialist. He is a top 4 D on most NHL teams.
Oh was it? What would have happened if we didn't use the protection slot on Jordie Benn? Would we have lost Jordie Benn?
The Leafs definitely don't have a great defense. Theyre just more mobile and the key guys are younger for the most part.
3rd pairing at best. Just too many mental lapses per game that cost the leafs a goal. His risk far outweighs the reward. He's simply too easy to expose as we saw in the Boston series last year. Maybe having an elite defensive dman with him could hide some of his flaws but the leafs don't have any of those.
he is a top 4 on an offensive side, on the D side ? he is 7-8 on almost any team.
The only upside of Jardinier is his pass abilities
Probably not, but we could've lost Hudon if we protected Emelin instead.
Coulda just protected Hudon in which case we would have lost Emelin just the same, since they were both left unprotected. In any case, Jordie is merely the embodiment of our embarrassment. It would have been best to have submitted his name like this:
Jordie Benn (I guess?? lol)
Coulda just protected Hudon in which case we would have lost Emelin just the same, since they were both left unprotected. In any case, Jordie is merely the embodiment of our embarrassment. It would have been best to have submitted his name like this:
Jordie Benn (I guess?? lol)
Agree, Shaw was protected (that's another debate) and Bergevin had to.
I think we can agree that Protecting Benn showed how our D core is in trouble