You're delusional. Here's a link. ESPN gamecast. Click on the picture and you will see exactly where every shot was taken from. 33-22 was the shot count which of course in itself is almost meaningless. But when you see where every single shot was taken from
you see that most NYI shots were clustered in prime scoring areas. And as the picture shows, NYI had 2-3 quality chances from prime scoring area for every 1 we had.
http://scores.espn.go.com/nhl/gamecast?gameId=400485130
Amazing how many delusional homers there are on this board. We got outplayed so badly. Sure Bernier was to blame for a couple of goals but overall, with average goaltending we give up 7-8 goals. And you call it a total fluke.
I wonder if guys like you even watch the games. I mean,
how can anyone watch that pathetic performance last night where Bernier stole a point for us and say not only that we didn't get outplayed, but say it was total fluke we lost? Just incredible.
I love this site. It comes in handy when people like you stick to the usual homer mantra - we got outshot but that doesn't mean anything, we keep the shots to the outside ... I've had a few conversations like this and when people see the pictures they don't quite know what to say.
Actually, the shot count was 35-22, so you're already off to a bad start. Despite this, it was neck and neck up until halfway through the 3rd period.
Funny how you reference game maps THIS time. I've never seen YOU use it before, but I have seen them used plenty of times. And more often than not this season, Leafs are on the winning end of the "prime scoring chances" race.
This of course trusts ESPN, the laughing stock of the hockey world, to accurately place every shot and goal (which even at first glance doesn't look right based on where the goals were scored), and that each "point blank scoring chance" comes with an equal chance to score. This also trusts the NYI stat guy, the second laughing stock of the hockey world, to accurately record shots in the first place.
It seems curious that nearly all of the in-close shots that the NYI had came in the 3rd period (like, 11), when those of us that watched the game know this isn't true (NYI stat guy probably recorded a shot for every whack at Bernier while he had the puck LOL), and when the Leafs still outscored the NYI 3-2 in that period.
But assuming we are going with trusting these people, I am willing to admit that while the goals were still incredibly flukey and most of those in-close chances were not "prime scoring chances" except in distance to the net, and they barely got any until the 3rd period, they got more close-up chances (though not 3:1 lmao) than I gave them credit for.
This is of course only under the condition that you agree to trusting these shot maps, and therefore admit that Leafs have outplayed their opponent on a regular basis this season.
I also think that this game proves that even Bernier is affected by inexperience, so there goes that other theory of yours.