nobody
Registered User
- Aug 8, 2017
- 3,723
- 3,304
Probably going to be standard around 800-850K. Doubt there are any bonuses since he's such a late pick.Definitely needs to add some weight and muscle!
Any idea on cap hit?
Probably going to be standard around 800-850K. Doubt there are any bonuses since he's such a late pick.Definitely needs to add some weight and muscle!
Any idea on cap hit?
Yup, gotta think NickA is next.One down, one to go
I think Dmitri will start turning heads on this forum. I'd say he is the single most slept on prospect in our system.
So on loan next season to Sibir. They better play him then. It's going to be awful if Sibir decides to treat him the same again.
So on loan next season to Sibir. They better play him then. It's going to be awful if Sibir decides to treat him the same again.
I'm not sure I like bringing him over just to loan him back for next season where he won't play again. Kind of defeats the purpose of having him actually play competitive hockey. Waste.
Why is Sibir upping his ice time next season? What changes?And what is this based on?
What most of us thought was this was going to be a waste year, where he'd shuttle between the KHL and MHL only actually playing in a league he's far too good for. We knew this year was coming and we're still upset by it. The light at the end of the tunnel was that next season he'd get his shot, playing 10-13 minutes a game and be able to prove himself to be a valuable asset to Sibir. Him coming to the AHL even for the end of this season is such an insane bonus as he *should* be getting actual minutes against competition for the first time since his d-1. There's no reason that a good showing here could prove to Sibir that he's worth actually playing. If he doesn't show well, he might not even be worth us worrying about.
Why is Sibir upping his ice time next season? What changes?
Could they not have ATO/PTO/loaned him this way, like so many others. So, they didn't have to burn his ELC years on less than half a season this year and to now loan him out again next year.
He's not going to get much development time this way either.
Because typically when a player plays this amount, it doesn't happen again without the player requesting out. Watch what happens with Yurov next season, or with Podkolzin the year before this one. It's fair to assume that he will get more minutes or else the Leafs wouldn't bother sending him back.
Hmm. We did that with Amirov and he's gotten healthy scratched in favor of players that are vastly inferior. Also, Podkolzin was banished for a pretty long time also. Most Canucks fans IIRC wanted him the f*** out of Russia because he was getting buried and wasn't getting his chances. It wasn't until later in his last year that he got more playing time because of injuries up the lineup and he started to produce a little bit more. I think loaning a kid back to the KHL is the equivalent of letting him play in the NCAA. I think you're sending them down because it'll allow them to physically mature while being in the comforts of their home/familiarity. But many many players have suffered in terms of playing time especially forwards in the KHL. KHL isn't a development league and they won't give their young kids a chance unless you're a Kaprizov type talent. Obviously there are exceptions to my generalization but very few IMO.
I'm not sure I like bringing him over just to loan him back for next season where he won't play again. Kind of defeats the purpose of having him actually play competitive hockey and it chips away at his ELC. Waste.