I guess that's why actual trade deals with major pieces rarely happens. Give and ask are too much for either side to contemplate.5 years of elite play > whatever that package offers.
I guess that's why actual trade deals with major pieces rarely happens. Give and ask are too much for either side to contemplate.5 years of elite play > whatever that package offers.
Problem is it's only terrible for 2 teams. Leafs would walk away laughing but than the other 2 teams wouldn't even consider it.Not every day that fans of all three times seem to think it's a terrible deal.
Problem is it's only terrible for 2 teams. Leafs would walk away laughing but than the other 2 teams wouldn't even consider it.
Yep. That seems about right for value. Right... Age = decline.hmmm bad move trading Suban for Nylander plus plus . By plus plus do you mean top prospect (Liljegrin and then a 1st)? Glad you're not the Leaf gm. Suban will start trending down. Age does that. Nylander and a couple of pluses all could be trending up, youth does that. Then there is the possibility that all 3, Nylander and the two pluses each become as valuable as Suban and for twice as long given the age differences.
Sort of like the stock market, knowing when to dump something that's topped out.
No deal.
Well we’ll see what Karlsson gets. We can revisit this then. LolYep. That seems about right for value. Right... Age = decline.
Not every player is the same. Athletes like Subban have excellent conditioning, and he has been incredibly healthy because of how he plays.
If Karlsson gets $11m+ (very likely), then Subban will look good at $9m.Well we’ll see what Karlsson gets. We can revisit this then. Lol
He will but I meant we’ll see what players he gets traded for.If Karlsson gets $11m+ (very likely), then Subban will look good at $9m.
Yep. That seems about right for value. Right... Age = decline.
Not every player is the same. Athletes like Subban have excellent conditioning, and he has been incredibly healthy because of how he plays.
Well we’ll see what Karlsson gets. We can revisit this then. Lol