Salary Cap: Leafs Salary Cap 2016-2017 season

bobermay

Registered User
Mar 6, 2009
12,352
301
Fredericton
Bumping this again.

It seems to me like the Leafs are really penny pinching to try and save cap space with our ELC bonuses. With Michalek joining the Marlies, we will have 1.1 mil in cap space. Once we put Lupul, Robidas, Horton on LTIR and acquire more players with salary... that cap space disappears.

My question is: What happens with the capspace we saved? Lets say, from October - December (or for 100 days) we have on average roughly 1 mil in cap space. Thats about $2750 per day or $275 000 throughout the 100 days. Does this $275 000 get lost with LTIR (if we use it) or is this space applicable for ELC bonuses?
 

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
42,997
9,190
Bumping this again.

It seems to me like the Leafs are really penny pinching to try and save cap space with our ELC bonuses. With Michalek joining the Marlies, we will have 1.1 mil in cap space. Once we put Lupul, Robidas, Horton on LTIR and acquire more players with salary... that cap space disappears.

My question is: What happens with the capspace we saved? Lets say, from October - December (or for 100 days) we have on average roughly 1 mil in cap space. Thats about $2750 per day or $275 000 throughout the 100 days. Does this $275 000 get lost with LTIR (if we use it) or is this space applicable for ELC bonuses?

You use up your banked cap space if you start using LTIR

Cap is calculated daily, 73 million cap space for the entire year calculates to $405,555.56 per day for 180 days.

if the Leafs were at say exactly 72 million for the first 100 days, they're using 400k cap space each day, and that's $5555.56 in space each day for 100 days for $555,555,56 space banked through the 100 days. They would have used 40 million in daily cap space at this point

Say the Leafs then lined a trade up where they would need to use LTIR, so they put someone on LTIR and then went up to 74 on the cap. They're now using $411,111.11 daily. Lets assume this stays exactly the same for the rest of the year. 80 days at that daily hit is $32,888,888,89.

So they'd have used a total of 72,888,888.89 in cap space this year and have $111,111.11 in cap space available for the ELC bonuses before overages are used. Not the ~555k they banked throughout the year.

So you can use LTIR to go over the daily cap but it doesn't mean you'll go over the cap at the end, but you don't get credit for all that time you were under.

I think this is how it works.
 

bobermay

Registered User
Mar 6, 2009
12,352
301
Fredericton
You use up your banked cap space if you start using LTIR

Cap is calculated daily, 73 million cap space for the entire year calculates to $405,555.56 per day for 180 days.

if the Leafs were at say exactly 72 million for the first 100 days, they're using 400k cap space each day, and that's $5555.56 in space each day for 100 days for $555,555,56 space banked through the 100 days. They would have used 40 million in daily cap space at this point

Say the Leafs then lined a trade up where they would need to use LTIR, so they put someone on LTIR and then went up to 74 on the cap. They're now using $411,111.11 daily. Lets assume this stays exactly the same for the rest of the year. 80 days at that daily hit is $32,888,888,89.

So they'd have used a total of 72,888,888.89 in cap space this year and have $111,111.11 in cap space available for the ELC bonuses before overages are used. Not the ~555k they banked throughout the year.

So you can use LTIR to go over the daily cap but it doesn't mean you'll go over the cap at the end, but you don't get credit for all that time you were under.

I think this is how it works.

Okay, thanks... If this is how it works, then it really doesn't make much sense to bank capspace IF you're planning on going the LTIR route.
 

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
42,997
9,190
Leafs daily cap tracker for last year, if anyone wanted to study it. If you had the time you could go through daily and find the individual daily cap hits and add them altogether to see if that's in fact the way it works with LTIR eating into banked cap space, but that's 180 days so I'm not going to waste my time doing it

https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/mapleleafs/cap_tracker/2016

edit: Based on the graph of "projected cap hit" it certainly appears that the LTIR is eating into the banked space.
 

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
42,997
9,190
Maybe important to note, in my example above they wouldn't need to use LTIR to get to the 74 million cap hit because staying at that number for the remainder of the year wouldn't put them over the cap. This is the projected cap space line in the graph and the reason teams can acquire bigger cap hits at the deadline than they can earlier.

They could in fact go to a "cap" of 74.25 million which would at the end leave them at exactly at 73 million using up all their banked space.

If they wanted to acquire a guy to get to say 76 million they would have to use LTIR as that would put their projected line over the 73 million cap. If they were only at that number for say a month before they traded someone at the deadline and got back down to say 72.5 million they would be back under the cap at the end of the year, and would have space for ELC bonuses despite the fact that they had to use LTIR for a chunk of the year.
 

bobermay

Registered User
Mar 6, 2009
12,352
301
Fredericton
Maybe important to note, in my example above they wouldn't need to use LTIR to get to the 74 million cap hit because staying at that number for the remainder of the year wouldn't put them over the cap. This is the projected cap space line in the graph and the reason teams can acquire bigger cap hits at the deadline than they can earlier.

They could in fact go to a "cap" of 74.25 million which would at the end leave them at exactly at 73 million using up all their banked space.

If they wanted to acquire a guy to get to say 76 million they would have to use LTIR as that would put their projected line over the 73 million cap. If they were only at that number for say a month before they traded someone at the deadline and got back down to say 72.5 million they would be back under the cap at the end of the year, and would have space for ELC bonuses despite the fact that they had to use LTIR for a chunk of the year.


Thanks, much appreciated
 

hockeywiz542

Registered User
May 26, 2008
15,917
4,987

performance bonuses will push the toronto maple leafs over the salary cap and leave them with an overage penalty next season.

It remains to be seen how significant of a hit they’ll take.

The play of the rookies over the final 14 games will not only go a long way towards determining whether the leafs qualify for the playoffs this spring, but also how their cap situation looks entering 2017-18.

A goal or two on either side of the ledger could potentially be the difference between having the ability to add an extra player this summer or at next year’s trade deadline.

Leafs management has been anticipating a monster overage since early in the campaign, when it quickly became evident they had a couple players on entry-level contracts capable of producing at a high level. the team could end up paying out as much as $5,582,500 in bonuses this season, which league sources believe would be the second-highest total ever.

The leafs currently have roughly $250,000 in projected cap space this season, according to capfriendly.com, which means that they’d assume an overage in excess of $5.3-million if all of the available bonuses were to be reached. That $5.3-million would be deducted from what they’re permitted to spend under the salary cap ceiling next season.

Realistically, the number will come in no lower than $2.4-million.

Where it ultimately ends up hinges largely on how many more goals auston matthews scores before the end of the regular season.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
11,550
9,781
Someone sent me the this link which says Dubas won't be able to keep all of MNMs

https://thehockeywriters.com/maple-leafs-dubas-contracts-salary-cap/

I don't think the article makes good arguments; does anyone think it makes good arguments?

It's basically, "So I, Joe Blogger, ran some numbers from a cap website and plugged in a bunch of arbitrary salary figures for players not signed and with whom I have no relationship to them or their agents or no knowledge of negotiations and feel confident I'm qualified to argue publicly with the General Manager of the Maple Leafs, Kyle Dubas, as well as his cap experts as to whether they in fact can afford the players they claim they can. Because, I would know"
 

Advanced stats

Registered User
May 26, 2010
11,652
7,551
He only expects the cap to rise 1.5 million, when it's risen 6.5 million in the last 2 years?

What calamity is expected?
 

willmma

Registered User
Jan 5, 2017
3,182
4,063
This is how I see it playing out.

I have
AM at $11M
MM at $7.5M
WN at $6.5M
and I took into account Kessel's $1.2M

Assuming we are signing 21 to the roster
And I assumed cap goes up 5% per year
I didn't include any LTIR in the calculation (because I don't know how it affects things)


2018-192019-202020-212021-22
Tavares, John11000000110000001100000011000000
Marleau, Patrick62500006250000
Kadri, Nazem4500000450000045000004500000
Hyman, Zach225000022500002250000
Brown, Connor21000002100000
Leivo, Josh925000
Matthews, Auston925000110000001100000011000000
Marner, Mitchell894167750000075000007500000
Kapanen, Kasperi863333
Johnsson, Andreas787500
Ennis, Tyler650000
Nylander, William6500000650000065000006500000
Rielly, Morgan "A"5000000500000050000005000000
Zaitsev, Nikita4500000450000045000004500000
Gardiner, Jake4050000
Hainsey, Ron3000000
Carrick, Connor1300000
Dermott, Travis863333863333
Andersen, Frederik500000050000005000000
McElhinney, Curtis850000
Player 21
Total62208333664633335725000050000000
CAP78300000822750008644875090831187.5
Space16091667158116672919875040831187.5
Unfilled191214
Average space16091667175685224332292916513
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
You will notice that we have lots of space, even our tight year 2019-20.
We can even add a $7M defenseman. We just need to fill up the ranks with cheap <$1.1M players

For example in 2019-20 if we get a $7M defense man that would leave $8.8M for 8 players so $1.1M per player.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad