Xanner
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2009
- 484
- 216
Name that goalie.
How about you ask me that sometime in sept before training camp to see if the leafs signed a depth goalie in free agency.
Name that goalie.
Name a team in the league that would be comfortable if their starting goalie went down for an extended period of time.
I'll take Sparks 10 out of 10 times over Toskala!Vesa Toskala?
Same things as some players who have been mailing it in for months *cough* Matthews *cough* . Some fans seem to think people are complaining about 1 game or something, but when the pattern becomes so apparent then there is likely a problem there, production aside.
Same thing applies here. On paper, Sparks numbers are ok for a backup. However scouting him, he swims worse than Riemer with worse positioning than Gustavsson. He relies on his reflexes to make saves which is not any sort of long term way to stay in the league.
And to make matters worse, McBackup outplayed him last year AND in pre-season, but Sparks was gifted the job because of his age. It completely crapped all over the entire "accountability" thing they had been preaching all this time.
Calgary it is this years starter that is worse.Calgary, San Jose, and Washington (2nd, 5th, and 6th in the NHL in points right now) all have backups with worse than Sparks's .902 SV%.
Boston.easy. Tampa.
Or it's the other way around, because I didn't see even a tenth of all this complaining about his game before his contract.
Either way, this is not the place for that discussion.
He’s a more athletic version of Andrew hammond. He is above himself. He will come back to earth as everyone does.Why?
Oh joy. Another year of Sparks. And let's not kid ourselves, that's exactly what this is heading towards. Sparks is Dubas' guy. There's nothing he can do to lose that job. Even if you bring some guys in and they outplay him...he's still going to be gifted the job just like he was this year.
that's basically my issue with it. (well with everything you've said).
i don't think Sparks should have the job, I don't think Sparks should be the back up next year . but as I said i just feel if anyone has to say anything that's not. *swoon, isn't this team so amazingly dreamy* it's "lol why can't you just enjoy the team."
easy. I can enjoy the team, and point out the flaws at the same time.
There are many quality back ups. We simply have the worse
Ok. My opinion is that he is the worse as he is playing on a top team after looking only SAN Jose is getting worse back up goalie tending of the top teams.Factually incorrect. He is 47th in Save Percentage, and 51st in GAA of 69 goalies, who have played at least 10 games.
People somehow want 40 million spent on 4 forwards and still have A quality players making 1 million.We have no money to upgrade and this is a dirt cheap signing, what do you want as this point
It was the right move at the time, and no hindsight is going to change that.
Oh, little song, little dance, Dubas's head on a lance.We have no money to upgrade and this is a dirt cheap signing, what do you want as this point
If he isn't the worst, isn't it enough that he would even be in that discussion?We don't not have the worst.
his effort level, his give a crap meter, his willingness to get hit, all of it has been garbage for months. Matthews was always able to take over games, lately he is invisible until he makes 1 play that goes in and then back to coasting.
If he isn't the worst, isn't it enough that he would even be in that discussion?