Skolman
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2018
- 9,433
- 7,979
Tavares has negative value, you're going to need to add a lot if he's involved.One of the core 4 go back other way?
Tavares has negative value, you're going to need to add a lot if he's involved.One of the core 4 go back other way?
One of the core 4 go back other way?
Tavares has negative value, you're going to need to add a lot if he's involved.
No.For Tavares + Lilgren?
Have you tried to give her a call?Any of the core 4 without an nmc? I could see Marner or Matthews for Karlsson+.
Highly unlikely, but it’d be interesting.
Also, I’m interested in Emma Watson. Doesn’t mean anything is happening there.
Not after the scam he pulled on us. Sharks cleared the whole org for him just for him to head to TorontoRemember SJ loves Tavares
Why bring? Trade one albatros contract for another. Im sure someone can photoshop tavares with sharks blanket.
He also makes 11 mil per for 2 more seasons.He was a ppg player last year no he doesn't.
That is Eklund for sure!BREAKING NEWS:
...Toronto Maple Leafs interested in...not being a running joke...E5...
Hey Billy Bob Thornton got Angelina Jolie so I would say you got a shot at least.Any of the core 4 without an nmc? I could see Marner or Matthews for Karlsson+.
Highly unlikely, but it’d be interesting.
Also, I’m interested in Emma Watson. Doesn’t mean anything is happening there.
Don’t be ridiculous. He was PPG last year. He might be a little overpaid but isn’t a negative value asset.Tavares has negative value, you're going to need to add a lot if he's involved.
Any of the core 4 without an nmc? I could see Marner or Matthews for Karlsson+.
Highly unlikely, but it’d be interesting.
Also, I’m interested in Emma Watson. Doesn’t mean anything is happening there.
He definitely doesn't have value around the league, it's not like he's looked at as a positive asset.Don’t be ridiculous. He was PPG last year. He might be a little overpaid but isn’t a negative value asset.
Yes he is. He's too slow to play C now. He's a $11 million wing and PP specialist. No one is looking for thatDon’t be ridiculous. He was PPG last year. He might be a little overpaid but isn’t a negative value asset.
Leave it to HF to suggest a PPG, 80 GP player has negative value.Tavares has negative value, you're going to need to add a lot if he's involved.
eklund has no crediblity or and sources .the leafs only leak out what they want to .this is just a lazy summer rumor with no legsLeave it to HF to suggest a PPG, 80 GP player has negative value.
Give me a couple trade proposals that you believe the Leafs could/would get for TavaresLeave it to HF to suggest a PPG, 80 GP player has negative value.
With that contract I would say he does have negative value. Not that it matters since there is no way he would waive unless he wants to go to a team with a chance to win the cup. SJ is not that.He was a ppg player last year no he doesn't.
He didn’t get mad because he wasn’t traded. He got mad having to answer a stupid question about it. There’s a difference.Karlsson will never waive his NMC he's living the life in SJ and he got all mad last year when reporters asked him questions around the TD.
Did you even read any of this thread before posting that crap?Tavares for EK straight up.