JadedLeaf
Registered User
That is wasn't a bunch of veterans on the Marlies like the poster I was quoting was implying.What is the logical link with the post you quoted ?
That is wasn't a bunch of veterans on the Marlies like the poster I was quoting was implying.What is the logical link with the post you quoted ?
It's the other way around.
The league has a maximum number of vets that can dress up for a game.
From ahl.com
"Of the 18 skaters (not counting two goaltenders) that teams may dress for a game, at least 13 must be qualified as “development players.” Of those 13, 12 must have played in 260 or fewer professional games (including AHL, NHL and European elite leagues), and one must have played in 320 or fewer professional games. All calculations for development status are based on regular-season totals as of the start of the season."
From Gurry: "Yeah but would you expect anyone you argue with here to actually know the rules?"
Sorry to mess with your party line...
Yikes!Calvin De Hann now sucks
First example of Leafs cap crunch
They could only go 1 year
He’d immediately be there best defender
Lightning & Bruins will load up Stamkos & Bergeron lines on Reilly and nullify his stength and keep him in the defensive zone for entire shifts
A puck possession line like Bergeron’s will have those inexperienced and defensively challenged Leafs defenseman in a puddle
Glad you are catching up?Yikes!
Bahahahaha.Yikes!
What are you doing bickering on a hockey forum when you could be making millions with your crystal ball?
The ink on the Nylander bonus check won't even be dry on July 1st when he is traded.
I just wonder now who will take him on.
Anyone can do 'We can and we will' when you hand over 4 blank cheques. Why give yourself a pat on the back for this?
Doesn't look like a Stanley cup winning roster to meI have no idea why people are acting like we can't fit this roster under the cap next season. We'll likely be unable to add any significant assets, that's true, but we can easily run our current roster for the next two seasons under the cap. We just have to apply all the bonuses to the cap this year. And we'll have to run a young dcore season after this one and hope for the best, but once Marleau and Horton's contracts are over, we're free from worries over the cap. Likely works out to something like this:
16.2 M cap space
-7M Nylander's new contract
+2M Matthews/Marner ELCs coming off the books
-11M Matthews' new contract
-8M Marner's new contract
-Leivo/Carrick/McBackup replaced by equal cost players
+7M letting Hainsey & Gardiner go to UFA
-2M Liljegren and Rosen/UFA replacing Hainsey/Gardiner
+1M Kapanen's ELC gone
-2-2.5M Kapanen's new contract
+2M cap raise
--------
Comes to 2M over the cap, but with Horton's 5.3M LTIR contract, we're still left with 3.3M in wiggle room.
So there's the math, add 1M each to our 3 young forwards if you're hoping they sign for more, but we're still good cap wise. This would likely be our 2019-2020 roster
[SPOIL]Marleau-Matthews-Nylander
Hyman-Tavares-Marner
Johnsson-Kadri-Kapanen
Grundstrom-Lindholm-Brown
Rielly-Zaitsev
Dermott-Liljegren
A mix of Rosen/Marincin/Holl/Borgman/UFA
So obviously in 2019-2020 our D is going to be weak but we'll be betting on it just needing to get the puck out of the zone to let the forwards do their work, so considering it's filled with PMDs it shouldn't be too harmful.
[/SPOIL]
So, tell me why I'm wrong and why we're destined for cap hell unless we trade Nylander/Marner to your team for peanuts
holy hell... this is pretty sad my dude. You gotta get out moreWanna borrow my crystal ball? It's pretty accurate
holy hell... this is pretty sad my dude. You gotta get out more
Anyone can do 'We can and we will' when you hand over 4 blank cheques. Why give yourself a pat on the back for this?