I'm not discussing Pastrnak's contract negotiations, I'm discussing Nylander's contract negotiations....
In no way does it make sense to suggest a 20 goal, 61 point winger is as good as a 35 goal, 80 point winger.
How can you even debate this?
Even Pastrnak's 20 year old season was better than Nylander's 20 or 21 year old season..... it was very clear who the better player was....
But like I said, they were horrible comparables. Only way you can suggest their numbers are similar is when you completely disregard age and quality of teammates... which is completely absurd... (Pastrnak's first two seasons were on the 3rd/4th line)
Huh?
You compare the players AT THE TIME of the contract.
At the time of the contracts. They had very similar
Stats. That would lead them to have similar contracts. They both had very similar numbers to other players. Who ALL got between 8.25-9.25% AAV.
Again. Like I said. Look at quality of teammates. Pasta was a 45-50pt player until he got on the best line in the league.
Coincidence?
Nylander spent the first 20 games of his career playing on a tanking team. He spent about 50 games on the 3-4th line too.
He got PP2. Time. He had back to back 60 pt seasons.
Pasta is absolutely making the most of his time. But to look at numbers post contract and think they have any weight in other players
contract negotiations is nuts.
Unless you think that it makes sense to compare every superstar who has had a slow start in contract negotiations.
“Thornton got like 8 pts in his rookie year..... look at him at 25”. Pay me like a hall of famer.
It works both ways.