Gotta be one of the funniest statements I've ever read on this site.
You'll have 20m tied up in two top 6ers, no other bonafide top 6ers, no #1D, barely any top 4D, and a completely unproven goalie. And you have what, 45m for 4 top 6 players, 3 top 4D, a #1G, and whatever prospects you bring up and want to sign in the next 3 years? And you're going to...do this through FA?
MMMm, yeah I don't think this is even going to happen but hypothetically if it did I think you'd be even worse off than you are now somehow.
Tavares has one more year left after this year, it's a nonissue if they want to sign Nylander. They have a ton of upcoming UFAs too.Another reason why the Tavares signing was awful and un-needed. Leafs already had 3 up and coming elite forwards.
This year, the Leafs are spending 57.5% of the cap on 5 players (Matthews, Marner, Tavares, Nylander and Reilly).
If this contract happens, next year, even with the upper limit increasing, they would be spending 61.5% of their cap on those same guys.
They're not winning anything with that sort of cap allocation, and next to no impact ELC players on the horizon (especially on D).
They're not winning anything with that sort of cap allocation.
Tavares has one more year left after this year, it's a nonissue if they want to sign Nylander. They have a ton of upcoming UFAs too.
Tavares comes off the books after next season so assuming he signs a more cost-effective deal (say $8.5mx2) it creates some flexibility.
Not sure what you're talking about. The poster was indicating that the Tavares contract is an issue, but it isn't since he has one more year after this one and the Leafs can easily sign Nylander to that contract with all the guys that are leaving as UFAs.It's a pretty big issue, still.
Let's fast forward to 25/26.
The Leafs would have Matthews at 13.25M, Nylander at 11.25M, Reilly at 7.5M, and let's just pencil in Marner for $12.25M.
Even with a $92.5M cap, that's 48% committed to 4 players, AND they'd have to replace a PPG 2nd line center.
Not sure what you're talking about. The poster was indicating that the Tavares contract is an issue, but it isn't since he has one more year after this one and the Leafs can easily sign Nylander to that contract with all the guys that are leaving as UFAs.
It's a pretty big issue, still.
Let's fast forward to 25/26.
The Leafs would have Matthews at 13.25M, Nylander at 11.25M, Reilly at 7.5M, and let's just pencil in Marner for $12.25M.
Even with a $92.5M cap, that's 48% committed to 4 players, AND they'd have to replace a PPG 2nd line center.
It isn't. It's a 5 million dollar increase from his current contract. Muzzin alone who wasn't playing this year will compensate for that, the cap is also going to increase.It is an issue if they're trying to ice a contending team for next season.