Some guy got traded to San Jose who wasn't a bad defenderGee, do you think maybe it's because teams don't trade away players like Alex Pietrangelo?
The McDonogh and Karlsson trades tell a different taleNylander for Pietrangelo would be absolutely steal for Toronto. No way that's the only ask.
Pietrangelo is a top 5-7 D in the game. He's worth closer to Marner than Nylander.
Great tip-in. He should be the net front presence on the PP
Can find a clip of any D making a mistake
If it's true that they turned down Petro....then it was very clear that it was either sign or sit....Dubas had no intention of trading him if that's the case.Friedman said Blues called on Nylander and brought up Pietrangelo but Toronto didn't want to move Nylander for him and wanted to ultimately sign him. He went on to say Toronto may circle back in the future and see if a deal can be made without Nylander.
I don't see that happening though as I wouldn't want to give up Kap and Liljegren and I can't see how both wouldn't be involved for Petro.
He’s not just an average “a top six winger” he hit 60 points as a 20 year old rookie. You don’t trade players that young and that good for vets.
Not if you actually want to have sustained success in today’s NHL. Which is why it’s never happened in recent years.
When you're offered The biggest missing piece from your team, in the form of a 28 year old #1 RHD...i think you do it, pretty easily.
The idea of sustaining some long-term success off into the far future is far-fetched these days. Just look at where teams like the Kings and Blackhawks are right now. The Penguins are the only ones really still clinging to that, by essentially boiling their core down to 2-3 players. It's even more extreme now, considering teams are now paying their core pieces 8 figure salaries right out of ELC before they've even won a darn thing. Windows are narrowing, "sustainable" cores are shrinking. More pieces are becoming more moveable because you need to maintain flexibility around your core 2-4 players. If you can get that critical missing piece in prime years at a great cap number for this year and next...that's 2 kicks at the can, as good as you're ever gonna get. While you can afford premium supporting pieces with Matthews and Marner on ELCs, Babcock still within his shelf-life as coach, a goaltender playing a Vezina candidate level. Pietrangelo moves the contender needle massively more than Nylander for the Leafs in the near 2-year future...and really, probably in a few years after that as well.
One way or another, sooner or later the Leafs are going to have to boil their forward core down (like the Penguins and Hawks) to Matthews+Tavares and there's really only going to be room for one of Nylander/Marner long-term (at most). If you can make that decision now, and get that top-pairing RHD to put you over the top...you do it. Forget about half a dozen years from now...your team/core is going to need to be substantially streamlined/narrowed and look very different by then anyway.
If they’re going to trade a Nylander or Marner (and I don’t agree at all it’s inevitable that t happens) it’s not going to be for an older vet, it’ll be for a similarly aged player.
Age and contract status is a major variable in any trade.
That’s a knee slapper! LolI think St. Louis would prefer to erase that whole deal and start again with Marner+.
If you're trading a winger for a similarly aged defenceman though, you're going to get a significantly inferior defenceman to Pietrangelo. The market for top defencemen is just so much steeper. You're gonna maybe get a #3D at best, instead of a #1D like Pietrangelo should continue to be for at least a handful more years. That's a big downgrade in the pursuit of youth and contract status.
Whilst you maybe correct , i could have said the exact same thing , it's not rocket science :What scares me is that if Elliot is saying it, it probably means he's a good fit.
If you're trading a winger for a similarly aged defenceman though, you're going to get a significantly inferior defenceman to Pietrangelo. The market for top defencemen is just so much steeper. You're gonna maybe get a #3D at best, instead of a #1D like Pietrangelo should continue to be for at least a handful more years. That's a big downgrade in the pursuit of youth and contract status.
K so you're not interested in have an actual conversation. That's cool.Not my problem you can't handle the truth. You need to be reminded I guess. The situation is what it is.
Except that he has 1.5 years left, is due for a massive raise, and is currently playing some of the worst hockey in his career.
There is more to value than just value in a vacuum or past pedigree.
A "massive raise"? Pietrangelo is on a good deal right now. And as a UFA, he's not going to get Doughty money. Probably something closer to the John Carlson coming off a Stanley Cup sort of ballpark. So essentially, maybe a ~$1Mish and change more than Nylander? Maybe an extra $2M at worst? Sure he could walk...but he's a good ol' Ontaria boy, who would be going to a team with serious Cup aspirations, lots of talent, and a well-respected coach. I'd like to think they'd have a pretty good inside track on re-signing him.
I mean, if you think 28 year old Pietrangelo is washed up and never going to return to form, i guess you don't do the deal. I find it hard to believe he's not going to rebound though. There's also more to value than "what have you done for me lately?" Petro has a solid track record of being arguably a Top-10 defenceman in the league, and just happens to be having a rough year in a season where that entire Blues team seem to be a bit...off. That established past pedigree and track record is a pretty significant counterweight against one bad third of a season.
K so you're not interested in have an actual conversation. That's cool.
If Dubas turned down Pietrangelo for Nylander then he must not know much about contending with contributing ELCs.If it's true that they turned down Petro....then it was very clear that it was either sign or sit....Dubas had no intention of trading him if that's the case.
LolI think St. Louis would prefer to erase that whole deal and start again with Marner+.
I kind of agree, i like Nylander...but dam, if Petro was offered? I think i would have pulled the trigger.If Dubas turned down Pietrangelo for Nylander then he must not know much about contending with contributing ELCs.