Dbrownss
Registered User
- Jan 5, 2014
- 31,359
- 8,734
Doug Armstrong said Petro is declining?But repeating homeristic views when your own GM states the opposite isn't a bad opinion? Interesting...
Doug Armstrong said Petro is declining?But repeating homeristic views when your own GM states the opposite isn't a bad opinion? Interesting...
In a vacuum that makes sense but when you factor in term it gets more complicated. Is one year of player x worth more than many years of player y?Exactly. The Blues aren't moving a #1 defenseman for a 60 point winger with upside. Not unless they are 100% certain he wasn't extending here, which would be highly unlikely at this point.
Can't argue that...now the only issue is cost to acquire.Pietrangelo or Parayko either way improves Leafs defense!
Kapanen (breakout yr)
Bracco (ready for NHL duty)
Zaitsev (RHD)
Sparks (can platoon with Allen)
1st (always a great asset)
For
Pietrangelo (clearly a #1 RHD, but is struggling)
Binnington (can slot in as backup)
If St.Louis prefers, they could replace Bracco and the 1st with Liljegren.
Is this something you just copy and paste for funsies?
I flat out said next year won't be good, but after that the picture gets brighter. I've done the math enough times, dealing with people who're drooling over the prospect of the Leafs struggling. We'll be fine.
We should listen to this guy. He knows all about the bolded with his 31 year old mid-tier goalie making 10.5 mil and a 33 year old defenseman who can't stay healthy making 8 mil for the next 8 years.
YIKES!
I think St. Louis would prefer to erase that whole deal and start again with Marner+.
Nah, not reallyThis is not about the Habs, it's about the Leafs. But if you want to talk about the Habs, this is not the thread.
I simply broke down my perception about the Leafs D and their cap situation. It's more logical than not and I think you are getting too sensitive about it. You had no reply other than to switch it to the Habs. You got anything productive to say?
Nylander for Pietrangelo would be absolutely steal for Toronto. No way that's the only ask.
Pietrangelo is a top 5-7 D in the game. He's worth closer to Marner than Nylander.
No he is not!Nylander for Pietrangelo would be absolutely steal for Toronto. No way that's the only ask.
Pietrangelo is a top 5-7 D in the game. He's worth closer to Marner than Nylander.
Ya the kid that's on pace for 100 assists. And you want more? Please.
Lol no he isn’t.
Vet players and soon to be UFAs have subpar trade value compared to what folks on here seem to think.
I don’t know how many of these guys need to be traded for quantity packages of picks and B prospects for folks to realize this.
The Blues would have to actually be motivated to move Pietrangelo to accept that kind of return though. So you can drag out comparables all you like but the Blues likely won't accept a futures package, they'll look to retool for next year and re-sign Petro when it comes up.
That’s fine, they absolutely don’t have to trade him.
But if they do try to, no mater what the team, it’s going to be for a quantity package of futures not a 1 for 1 type deal.
Honestly, would be smarter for them to resign him, and he’s not exactly the kind of player the Leafs need. They likely can’t afford to gut their prospect pool right now.
If the Leafs legitimately had an opportunity to get Pietrangelo for Nylander, and turned it down for those sort of potential future complications...that'd be asinine. You don't turn down a #1D for a Top-6Winger. Especially not when that winger is looking for like $7M anyway, which gets you awfully close to the ballpark of what Pietrangelo's future salary ask probably ends up being.
Why?
No Gm would trade a 22 player of Nylander’s caliber for a guy whose going to be UFA in under 2 seasons.
I am glad we kept the long term signed 22 year old Nylander over dealing him for the 28 year old declining 1.5 years left on contract Pietrangelo.
I think plenty of GMs would do that if the UFA was a player like Pietrangelo.
Yet there isn’t a single comparable example of this happening in recent years.
Gee, do you think maybe it's because teams don't trade away players like Alex Pietrangelo?
Gee, do you think maybe it's because teams don't trade away players like Alex Pietrangelo?