Want to impress me? Do it with your eyes closed!
Why should the fact that he can skate so well be a point against him?
If you takeaway how good Matthews is at stick handling in traffic and along the boards, how good would he be?
McDavid is an electrifying player. Even if you took some of his speed away and he can only skate as good as Phil Kessel for example, he would still be an elite player. His vision is incredible, his ability to make plays at that speed is actually more impressive than the speed itself. There are players who can skate fast but can't do anything with the puck at that speed (Grabner etc) and there are players who can make good plays but can't skate fast. Combine both and you have a playmaking version of Pavel Bure which is McDavid.
I'm just wondering about his sustainability over his career, more in a comparison to Crosby... considering his effect on the game is being considered the same as Crosby in terms of being a phenom. Crosby is fantastic in all facets, his skating, his passing, his compete level, his strength along the boards, his starting and stopping etc. Comparing Crosby to current young players, Crosby has Matthews puck handling in tight, his edge work, but he's got johnny hockeys passing, and he has a high compete level, and probably a shot comparable mcdavids now.
Mcdavid is an incredible skater, but he seemed to be lacking in a lot of what Crosby has in terms of overall game.
From what I've seen thus far, id say that if I had a choice between a young 21 year old Crosby and a 21 year old mcdavid. I'd likely choose Crosby.
That's all.... have to say that it's pretty incredible how much better a skater mcdavid is compared to pretty much every hockey player before him.