I know it's not easy, and I'm sure it takes hard work, but some people just aren't good at things.
LOL..Oh man... Sure got chilly in here....
I know it's not easy, and I'm sure it takes hard work, but some people just aren't good at things.
Oh and get rid of the "sources". Even if they're real--they read like opinions. There's really no purpose for them IMO.
agreed partly. People who own pro sports franchises were usually for the most part pretty well off before owner their particular team. I would think most Prospective buyers want to own a team for the love of the game and for the thrill of building a champion.
For owners whos family have been in the business for generations its more of a business..
Im sure Ledeky and Malkin wont be any better off in quality of life/living conditions than they were before they decided to become an owner of a sports franchise.
It just seems so odd to me. He always posts blogs here, they are always borderline terrible, and he always get ripped because how bad they are, yet he keeps on posting them. Nobody seems to appreciate these blogs, maybe he's a glutton for punishment ?
I know it's not easy, and I'm sure it takes hard work, but some people just aren't good at things. I remember one of his first blogs he posted here was a "review" of one of our drafts, and it basically just listed our draft choices, "so and so is a wing from Boston College", I was shocked at how bad it was. Even suggested, maybe you should put some of YOUR insight into the picks, a review actually has input. I don't know, I'm sure if I met the guy, I'd probably like him, seems like a nice enough guy, just not a good blogger with poor sources, press credentials or not.
People who're that well off typically don't get there by happenstance. $500+million is still $500+million. You don't get there by being poor at business.
The morning of the day the Isles signed Grabovsky, I asked BD if the Isles had any interest in Grabovsky. He gave me a one-word answer: No.
I'm not saying he doesn't know what he's talking about, but his sourcing is probably limited to one or two people and they may not be high enough on the chain for really good information.
absolutely... I agree its still a business at the end of the day but when you get to the point where you can/want to afford/buy a pro sports franchise, I don't think the overall goal is to make money. Its to develop a winning team and the joy of owning a pro team.
What man, especially a wealthy one wouldn't want to own a sports franchise?
Every blogger needs to carve him/herself out a niche. The reality is all he cares about is the clicks. The more traffic, the more ad money he makes. He don't care if you go because you enjoy his blog or go there so you can rip him a new butthole. The second you click on his ****** blog or follow him twitter, he wins. The best thing we can do is ignore him and he will eventually go away.
This tool started following me on twitter just to see if i would follow back.
Are you Red Tinted Visor on that other message board ? If so, welcome to our humble abide.
The Islanders are a business first and foremost. EVERY professional team is (if you want to follow a team that doesn't have the philosophy you can follow the Packers, because that's it). It's a business. Period.
You don't drop half a billion dollars to "win", you do it to make money.
As fan it's very easy for us to forget that notion.
I find it hard to believe that two partners, who are sharp and close friends are going to let Wang have any say a all. Plus, these guys have money and know how to make money. You make money by winning and one of the partners is a sports phanatic. The guy wants to win.
Just seems like a lot of your opinion, & that's fine. Nothing concrete, just constant "Source" comments, which really mean nothing.
Wouldn't this be some tidbits on how YOU think the joint ownership will work? I couldn't care less how it works, other than we finally have people coming in who care about the product on the ice, and not a business/land deal.
Let me say this, Wang is in control for another 2 years. That's not to say that the new bosses in 2 years aren't going to want to see a winning culture. Hopefully things will change. Wang will then be in a minority and therefore marginalized to his 1/3 share or less. So long as the majority partners agree Wang's opinion means little. Garth has 2 years, the sand in the hour glass is running out.
I would not be shocked to see changes coming once the new majority takes over. While they did spend a pretty penny for the team, I can't see them staying near the cap floor especially in Brooklyn. It will never work.
Ok. But they also didn't just buy a team to suck either. Most people in sports understand the concept that winning = financial success. If you want to win, you have to spend. What is even better for this club is the new owners have a 15 million dollar head start.
Did you catch that? Many here do not, so I am going to make it stand out:
THE NEW OWNERS HAVE A $15 MILLION DOLLAR PER SEASON FREE GIFT COURTESY OF BETTMAN AND THE LAST CBA.
It is actually more than that based on the increase in revenues, but let's just say $15 large for now as that is what was verified recently.
That means whatever the owners spend, deduct 15 million from that right off the top, and that is how much they are really spending. Luckily they have to spend about half of that on payroll if last season may be used as a yardstick. So $7m+ for payroll, $7m+ for toilet paper and breath mints, and there is no reason on earth for Ledecky, Malkin, and Wang to not spend to the max, because it really isn't "spending to the max." It is spending to the max MINUS $15 million (or more, haha).
Because of that, I pre-emptively call BS on anyone suggesting that it is fair and understandable for the ownership triad not to spend close to the max each season now, and moving forward.
Are you Red Tinted Visor on that other message board ? If so, welcome to our humble abide.
Some tidbits on how the new ownership will eventually work...
NY ISLANDERS REPORT: Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss
http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/54900/