Mazatt
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2019
- 2,819
- 2,085
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills at people suggesting retaining salary on Pavelski or Benn in a trade for Loui f***ing Eriksson. None of these proposals make a ton of sense.
Why the **** would the Canucks ever want to trade Eriksson for Lucic?
Nope Lucic always had worse value than Eriksson.Because that was his value at most. Vancouver will take a bad contract for him
Lucic would not be playing if he was on the Canucks. He's trash. And his contract is worse than Eriksson's.I don't get why you're laughing tbh. At least Lucic plays and he's from BC
Lucic would not be playing if he was on the Canucks. He's trash. And his contract is worse than Eriksson's.
Yeah theres still SIX years left on Benns contract at a WAY higher cap hit. Hes already declining RAPIDLY so will be lucky to be as good as Eriksson when he only has two years left in his contract like Eriksson does now. Add in all those extra years Benn has and its more then fair for DallasLOL this might be one of the worst "serious" offers I've ever seen on this board in a long long time.
You want us to retain, give up the better (albeit disappointing) veteran forward, and add 1st and 3rd round picks to it to bring in Eriksson and Goldobin?
Just wow.
Lucic had 9 less points last year, still provides physical play and only has 1 more year on his contract while having a lesser cap hit at 5.25 because of oilers retention. Not as bad as you make it look. Also you guys probably couldve went for Neal
Great sales pitch, Montreal should trade for him.
Are you actually here to discuss or just replying worthless stuff ?
Not saying he's good or anything, he's just as thrash as LE if anything.
Are you actually here to discuss or just replying worthless stuff ?
Not saying he's good or anything, he's just as thrash as LE if anything.
If we're talking worthless opinions, is"shoulda got Lucic" something worthy of a thoughtful reply? Edmonton has nothing to do with the OP or discussion. Neither does Calgary.
Pavelski and Benn aren't lighting it up, based on their contracts, but are contributing more then Eriksson is and we'd be happy to accomodate a trade around Eriksson one of them.