IslesRock4
Ever Forward
I wouldn’t say it’s wasted letters, and of course it’s hard for any of us to say where the value was directed in the deal.People keep lambasting the trade because of Zajac, but he was just a parting gift. I don't think we added anything in that trade to get Zajac. And even if you think we did then it was Jobst, or Greer, or both. Would anybody really care if the trade was Jobst and Greer for Zajac?
It's fine worrying about Palmeiri not really clicking or paying off yet, but this Zajac nonsense is wasted letters.
However, with the reports that we were “close” to getting Hall but Lou preferred the total package from NJ, and Hall did not even return a 1st, it’s easy to speculate that, yes, we did give up something of value for Zajac. Would Palmieri have warranted a 1st on his own? Again, no way for us to know, but it’s easy to draw the parallels with the Hall deal and come to the conclusion that it might have been just a 2nd+ if Zajac was not involved.
Then there’s the value of the 50% retention that also comes into play. As far as Greer and Jobst, they were almost certainly involved only because we were pressed against the contract maximum and would not have been able to add Palmieri, Zajac, and Coburn without trading 2 players. Bridgeport had a ton of forwards and this was a needed roster move.
Again, none of us know for sure what negotiations looked like or how the players are valued among GMs. But I’d say there’s way more evidence to claim that we did give up more because Zajac was involved, rather than to say he was just a parting gift.
And as of now, the Zajac addition is objectively pretty useless unless or until one of our centers goes down. We may be thankful for him at that point. But now, it gives Trotz another misfit toy in a lineup that cannot gel.