TopShelfWaterBottle
Registered
- Mar 16, 2014
- 3,384
- 1,376
Proposal: Kreider to ANA
- Thread starter TopShelfWaterBottle
- Start date
Flamesfan62
Registered User
Not even close to enough, starts with 1st and your top prospect then add from there.
TopShelfWaterBottle
Registered
- Mar 16, 2014
- 3,384
- 1,376
Ritchie went to early in his draft year and hasn't progressed much at all after that.
For me it starts with a 1st and Larsson/Steele/Jones then you add from there.
(this is ofcourse with the caveat that Kreider is fully healthy)
MMC
Global Moderator
I wish. This a joke of an offer. Ritchie is a huge disappointment and Petterson is our 4th best defense prospect at best.
DesertPenguin
Registered User
- Apr 22, 2015
- 3,087
- 1,600
This is atleast a real offer, not sure i'd do it if i was the GM but it's atleast a real offer.
TopShelfWaterBottle
Registered
- Mar 16, 2014
- 3,384
- 1,376
Ritchie does not hold the kind of value you think he does. Needs to be Steel/Jones... Or Kase i guess...
Yeah, i definitely like Larsson and he would have to be in any deal for Kreider imo. Not sure he has 1st pairing upside though, but i like him.
Nah! Ritchie is ok but will take a high D prospect and high forward prospect. may be throw in a late round pick. Nobody off your roster .
- Jul 25, 2012
- 40,338
- 35,620
I like krieder but the cost is probably too much for our taste... I think we need to hold on to Larsson/mahura to fill in our defense next season.
And I'm guessing 1 of Larsson/mahura would be what it takes to start the conversation,
And I'm guessing 1 of Larsson/mahura would be what it takes to start the conversation,
MMC
Global Moderator
Pettersson is one of our top D prospects, either second or third in the mix. If you think he's lower than that, then you do not know what you are talking about. Larsson is ahead of him. Mahura is debatable, but Welinski is not.
MMC
Global Moderator
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
Welinski is 24 years old.
He is not a better prospect than Pettersson.
He is not a better prospect than Pettersson.
Then you do not know what you are talking about. Mahura hasn't played at the level Pettersson has over the past three years. This should not be definitive. Welinski is further along, both in age and development, but his ceiling isn't as high as Pettersson's is.
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
I'd have Pettersson ahead of Mahura, personally, but I can see an argument. I like Mahura as a prospect, but I'm with Exit that there is nothing definitive that puts Mahura ahead of Pettersson.
Welinski just doesn't have an argument. He's older, and more developed as a player, but he also has far less room for growth in his game. At 24 years of age, he's played 4 NHL games, and it's not because Anaheim is so deep defensively that they couldn't make room for him if he were beating the door down.
I think Anaheim has a good top 3 for their D prospects, but I have a gap between #3 and Welinski. At least if we're looking at them as prospects.
Welinski just doesn't have an argument. He's older, and more developed as a player, but he also has far less room for growth in his game. At 24 years of age, he's played 4 NHL games, and it's not because Anaheim is so deep defensively that they couldn't make room for him if he were beating the door down.
I think Anaheim has a good top 3 for their D prospects, but I have a gap between #3 and Welinski. At least if we're looking at them as prospects.
Machinehead
GoAwayTrouba
