kings retain some salary as well as send staal or if it's a big deal with kreider for kovy ++ and salary retained...
have you guys seen Tampa bay's roster? Money can always be moved to load a team
As others have said, we do not want a mid 30s decaying Kovy, esp for an in his prime Kreider. We have been going thru gyrations b'c mgmt concurs that an extended Kreider is the most valuable scenario, whether we keep him for production [assuming great chemistry w/Zib and the correct linemate] or we eventually trade him.
We are still in need of dumping excess to get down to a minimum core, so we can give most mins to that core.
Why go vs that and add an overpriced unproductive vet without some serious benefit to make it worthwhile.
Sorry OP, no possible justification for yer premise on this one.
Kings fan here.
We could actually use a left shooting dman to hold things down until our prospects develop. Is Staal that bad these days that he'd be considered a cap dump?
I'd consider Kovalchuk for Staal and a draft pick.
I would like to oblige you, but not possible atm b'c:
Staal has NMC full control, and he likes his CT digs.
Even if he were to waive, Kovy would not be the answer for NY.
If he were to waive, we could make him available at half and something acceptable for 2 years term remaining. I am open to other suggestions but likely that would be Staal at half and two 3rds for a conditional 7th at your end.
Staal in his brief prime was once the best pure shutdown defenseman in the league, with the reach/strength/adequate speed and intangibles to shut down other teams' top scorers.
However, concussions and various injuries including to eye [which must require adjustment for depth perception] have taken a toll and diminished him. We all wish him well, but had hoped he'd have taken LTIR when this happened. He has improved but obv. is not what he once was.
If you want All Star level experience, solid in technique, a good guy in the clubhouse and a top rate mentor who can play more but should get limited 3rd pair or 7th D placing, he is a fine stopgap for only 2 yrs which are reasonable to buy out if nec. due to sudden cap emergency or other. Beyond that, no.
And again, due to NMC, this is moot discussion.
Rangers should have bought out him, not Shattenkirk.
But it is what it is....
Don't expect a match but if you do, pls create another thread to keep on topic and explore Skjei to LA. Again, don't immediately see agreement on currency but I haven't considered it fully.