sting101
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2012
- 15,950
- 14,864
odd he didn't make the U20 teamI am more surprised you think LA should add on top of Clarke.
odd he didn't make the U20 teamI am more surprised you think LA should add on top of Clarke.
This comment includes the eye test. Every person that wants to trade for Clarke should be watching a lot of his videos before they think that Garland is worth a Trade for him. And with an Add on no less?Every team that actually wants to trade for this guy has watched him actually play rather than stat watching
I will say this, losing Grans will hurt.. the kid is an absolute stud and will be NHL ready next season… IMHO, he can be in the NHL now.. but the Nucks wouldn’t have any reason to rush him.. unless your AHL team sucksGrans is the type of D prospect we're looking for but I'm not really comfortable with moving Garland for him, Boeser for Grans seems much more fair.
I'd push for Grans, 1st. We could take a contract back, but LA doesn't really have anything that needs to go out.
The next two games are make or break for the Canucks I think. Win them both, we probably have a real quiet deadline. Lose them both, and I think we sell on one of Boeser or Garland.
Happy hour is over for you.Have to imagine you start with Clarke and add from there.
I doubt Grans happens either.I so wish you were right, but no way that happens.
Haha That's accurateArvidsson-Kopitar-Garland
The "He's Taking the Hobbits to Isengard" Line
Grans and Faber isn't going to happen.Bjornfoot I would guess isn't happening either.Yea, I think this is why its happening. Canucks are depserate for rhd prospects or young nhl ready. Its probably going to be more than 1 rhd though. Prices are high, and i dont think 1 prospect gets you garland with multi years left at his hit
Dont think Clarke is in the conversation, but more like Grans, and faber. Or a current rhd with term like bjornfoot/roy + another as Kings are probably looking to dump one of them for one of their younger rhd on a elc
Clarke is 100% special, and I can see why he’s untouchable. Prospects of his caliber are moved once every few years - it just doesn’t happen. With that being said, I’d also rather not give up Garland. I like the contract he’s on, and he makes things happen on the ice. I’d rather move Boeser instead of Garland.This comment includes the eye test. Every person that wants to trade for Clarke should be watching a lot of his videos before they think that Garland is worth a Trade for him. And with an Add on no less?
And I don’t mean to imply that Garland is worthless. I’d love to have him. Only that Clarke is that special to the LA Kings and Garland does not move the needle on a trade for Clarke.
I doubt Grans happens either.
Have to imagine you start with Clarke and add from there.