Please point out the reaching in that post...If you think the Hawks thought of Lankinen as a #1 but had him 3rd on the depth chart to start the season and tried to find a #1 the past 6+ months then maybe you're the one reaching here...
So... wait, when did anyone say that? When did he say that? You are reaching because you're making up a opinion of others in your head.
Why do people desire to make up imaginary arguments and go on and on about them?
You seem to think it was dumb to not let a guy develop properly and get more N/A experience. What was the point of say rushing into pushing him into the NHL after 11 great games in a WC tourney? Was it a guarantee he was NHL ready? Does that mean he would play this way now if he was playing when 24 and less than a full year of AHL play? I do not get the view of your criticism other than dislike crediting Stan with anything about it. It's lacking an understanding of development or a care about the actual reality at hand.
And I'm someone all offseason who was saying this method of trusting these young prospects is far more likely to work out. I was maybe highest on Delia and thought Lankenin could of it cause I know others considered him the starter potential out of it with Delia backup potential, mostly because of style. But nobody proclaimed some guarantee of any. Part of the value of this season is you can get one to preform good, then great! you got your guy to keep in the expansion draft and go onward. Or you just help the tank if nobody can preform up to task.