DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
Would be? There was a period where some posters hypothesized that the Hawks didn't even want to offer him a contract.
I said a 'part of it'..when did I say the Hawks dumped him...anywhere? Didnt think so. I said it could be possible the Hawks didnt come close to offering 2.85mil which could have helped his decision.
A large portion of those bonuses are contingent on him winning the Conne Smythe, Calder etc.
It occurs to me: what if, in an alternate universe, the hawks traded Morin+Olsen for Versteeg and we still had Jimmy? Would we be better off?
morin+2nd round pick
Vs
Jimmy Hayes, Kevin Hayes
I think I prefer the path we're on.
I'm ok with him being gone, particularly as it seems that he didn't want to play for the Hawks. He certainly didn't "imprint" psychologically with the Hawks, as most draftees will with their respective teams. He lost that emotional connectedness with the organization, and didn't give it a chance to regain it. Four years is a long time in a 22 year olds' life.
However, I'm certainly not ok with essentially trading a mid-late first round pick for a mid-late second round pick. Anything after the mid-late first round is a complete crap shoot in the draft, and more likely than not the player chosen at 54 will only sniff the NHL for his career.
I still think that Players drafted by a Team should sign with them... that's how it should work. After spending 4 years of giving him time and help him develop.
Think we should get that compensatory pick from the Rangers
three years ago that 2nd would have been 57th overall as the Rangers made the conference finals.
two years ago that 2nd would have been 53rd
Last season it would have been 59th
if you average out draft position, the pick is 56th overall.
Take the 54th selection and be happy.
I said a 'part of it'..when did I say the Hawks dumped him...anywhere? Didnt think so. I said it could be possible the Hawks didnt come close to offering 2.85mil which could have helped his decision.
The pick in the first place was terrible. Hayes was slated to go somewhere in the 3rd or 4th round; it was really a big surprise when the Hawks drafted him. It's why I compared him to Shea McClellan earlier in the thread--it's the same situation. A new GM comes in and thinks he can hit a home run with a guy who has some interesting tools but a questionable skillset for the pros.People keep saying this but we wasted 4 years of development time on him too. Time that could've been spent developing someone else. Even if that 2nd ends up being better than Kayes, he's most likely going to take years to develop as well.
So instead of a first round pick being on our roster, we get to wait maybe 7 years later (from 2010) and see if he even pans out.
I don't fault bowman but this 2nd rounder isn't some blessing
The pick in the first place was terrible. Hayes was slated to go somewhere in the 3rd or 4th round; it was really a big surprise when the Hawks drafted him. It's why I compared him to Shea McClellan earlier in the thread--it's the same situation. A new GM comes in and thinks he can hit a home run with a guy who has some interesting tools but a questionable skillset for the pros.
That 2010 draft for the Hawks looks really bad, especially when you consider all the extra picks they had from the sell-off. Stephen Johns seems to be the last man standing that can bring something good out of the draft.
He was pegged to go that late? Maybe I am forgetting something, but I didn't think that we was that lowly regarded.
That 2010 draft for the Hawks looks really bad, especially when you consider all the extra picks they had from the sell-off. Stephen Johns seems to be the last man standing that can bring something good out of the draft.