Killem Dafoe
Hold my baby, man.
Staal is going to hold us by the balls now that Stralman is gone.
I don't think it matters, IMO. He's a deadline deal waiting to happen.
Staal is going to hold us by the balls now that Stralman is gone.
You're literally making it out to be like Tanner Glass is John Scott...
What is the Rangers grade after day 1 (if they truly are done for the day?):
With all the factors considered (other players signing elsewhere, salary cap, etc):
I say C+ - Stralman to Boyle is an uninspiring move, Glass was just very questionable, but Dom Moore is back at a pretty fair contract.
Grade isn't affected by the Pouliot deal. But there is much more to do.
I guarantee you a lot of fans are killing their front offices more than the Rangers.
What? No.
I don't think it matters, IMO. He's a deadline deal waiting to happen.
Glass is truly horrendous.
Yes, Jon, he is.
Glass is out of place in the new NHL. He doesn't know how to handle the puck. If you don't like Hags for having a low IQ, you will want to go visit Glass's house and leave a turd on his stoop. He's absolutely atrocious.
He's not John Scott. Sorry, but that's just cringe-worthy hyperbole.
No, it's not.
John Scott is a very bad hockey player who's a good fighter. Tanner Glass is a very bad hockey player who's a good fighter.
Just because Glass isn't a big oaf doesn't mean he's not as bad.
I don't think it matters, IMO. He's a deadline deal waiting to happen.
Dave America Lozo @DaveLozo 1m
Don't sleep on Tanner Glass for worst contract of the day. Free agency is a rich tapestry, assuming that tapestry was created with poop.
Glass is Paul Bissonnette without the terrible twitter persona
Glass is an exponentially better hockey player than Scott. Not sure how you can say that with a straight face.
Glass is an exponentially better hockey player than Scott. Not sure how you can say that with a straight face.
I have been for trading Staal for offensive help quite long time now but with the department of Strålman and addition of Boyle I'm not as sure anymore. Our defense will take a huge hit.
Just because he scores 10 points more than John Scott does in a typical season doesn't equal much when he's literally awful at everything else he does.
Neither player should be in the NHL.
Are you sure you know who Tanner Glass is?
He's a solid 2nd pairing PKer on Pittsburgh. The 5th best PKing team in the league.
He's exponentially faster than Scott. He at least can score now and then unlike Scott.
The two are not even comparable unless you are being willfully disingenuous in order to make a false point.
Are you sure you know who Tanner Glass is?
He's a solid 2nd pairing PKer on Pittsburgh. The 5th best PKing team in the league.
He's exponentially faster than Scott. He at least can score now and then unlike Scott.
The two are not even comparable unless you are being willfully disingenuous in order to make a false point.
I mean, John Scott has SIX MOTHER****ING POINTS IN HIS ENTIRE CAREER.
Glass is an exponentially better hockey player than Scott. Not sure how you can say that with a straight face.