Boud
Registered User
- Dec 27, 2011
- 13,569
- 6,995
I've read pretty much everything there is to read about Norris in the past week
on the middling stats - that is clearly circumstance driven in a situation where he joined a veteran team and as a freshman had limited opportunity in a scoring role. With much better opportunity this year with some big vets having moved on, if his stats don't improve it'll be time to get nervous
with him I keep coming back to him playing the WJC at 18. The American program has been as strong as ours this decade and if a kid plays on either team at 18 the odds of going on to a successful nhl career are quite high.
if you look at Bowers by comparison his NCAA stats were more impressive but I don't believe he even garnered an invite to one of the camps. The NCAA stats favour Bowers but when we go bestie on bestie, Norris makes Team USA and Bowers by virtue of not even having been invited would not have made Team Canada team B.
Unfortunately when you start to look at things like that instead of looking at the players abilities it starts to get misleading and you start to overrate/underrate prospects based on things that they simply do not control. Almost like saying that Weber is a better player than Subban because Weber was playing top pair on Team Canada while Subban was left out on most nights. There are so many things that come into play here that it cannot be simplified as you just did. The coaching staff and management of the WJC teams make these selections based on many things, including style of play they are trying to achieve, maturity level of player, is that player adding a different element that other players do not add? and etc etc. Sometimes it can legitimately just be a preference thing by the management and coaching, for example Phil Kessel not making team USA while he's one of the best players in the world under pressure, or Marty St-Louis not making team Canada years back.
Bowers and Norris are clearly in the same tier of prospects and likely that both turn out to have similar impacts on an NHL roster IF everything goes right and their development is good. When you start comparing players by who got chosen to this event and who did not, you're doing it wrong.