Habs
We should have drafted Michkov
- Feb 28, 2002
- 21,267
- 14,808
scandella would be nice as a 5/6 over merril/kilak tho
Scandella has already proven how much he sucks as a hockey player, I never want to see that useless scrub again.
scandella would be nice as a 5/6 over merril/kilak tho
scandella would be nice as a 5/6 over merril/kilak tho
I can't argue with the move at this point. Merrill and Gus have given us more than Mete was
More of what
Merrill's strength is his positioning and ability to box people out in front of the net and clamp down on players in the corners. Though he is atrocious at moving the puck quickly.
Gus is better on the pp than Mete, AINEC.
Agree, at least they bring 1 thing, Mete was bringing nothing importantMerrill's strength is his positioning and ability to box people out in front of the net and clamp down on players in the corners. Though he is atrocious at moving the puck quickly.
Gus is better on the pp than Mete, AINEC.
This was one of the all-time classics. I always remember that whenever I'm engaging someone who claims to be into so called analytics.When Edmundson was signed last summer, we saw these bogus heat maps posted again and again arguing that he was one of the worst defensemen in the NHL. That was complete nonsense, but I'm glad to see that proven so quickly.
This was one of the all-time classics. I always remember that whenever I'm engaging someone who claims to be into so called analytics.
Yup…..I remember the arguing point was he was benched which automatically = garbage without ever considering his ENTIRE body of work.A lot of posters should eat crow.
When Edmundson was signed last summer, we saw these bogus heat maps posted again and again arguing that he was one of the worst defensemen in the NHL. That was complete nonsense, but I'm glad to see that proven so quickly.
We also had posters arguing that there was no need to acquire Edmundson given the Habs already had Chiarot ... Neglecting the fact that Chiarot and Edmundson would play on different pairings.
A case of the eye test showing me the opposite of what analytics showed. Granted I was watching him with St. Louis and he looked good. Just didn’t fit in Carolina. Kudos to Bergevin for seeing how Joel would be a fit in Montréal.
Imagine he was a UFA this summer and the type of contract he’d get. Far north of 3.5m per year.
To be honest Edmundson whole career has been a roller coaster. His year in Carolina was not unique. Consistency has always been his problem. He was able to be consistent this year in a shortened season. Will be interesting to see next season how he'll do with a full schedule. He never was able in his career to handle a full 82 games schedule very well.
I would pass on scandella
I would get Dylan demelo
Don't forget he was still a young D before to, he's only 27 and entering his primeTo be honest Edmundson whole career has been a roller coaster. His year in Carolina was not unique. Consistency has always been his problem. He was able to be consistent this year in a shortened season. Will be interesting to see next season how he'll do with a full schedule. He never was able in his career to handle a full 82 games schedule very well.
Posters are seeing mete skating faster than both of them, sonthey think he is better. Like many poster say. We need a real PMD. Mmm. Gustafsson is a pmd. You like him to defend in the d zone? I mean. Its not because you have a pmd your team gonna be better. We have 4 towers on d corp and i keep them way before a pmd like barrie or brodie.The posters who were telling me that Mete is better than Chiarot and Edmundson, despite being even worse than Ouellet in the playoffs last year, have mysteriously disappeared.
Worst dman in the league they said lol. Those posts, the takes on Ben Chiarot, Weber not a top dman, can’t pay a goalie 10mm, Byron + retention for nothing.A lot of posters should eat crow.
When Edmundson was signed last summer, we saw these bogus heat maps posted again and again arguing that he was one of the worst defensemen in the NHL. That was complete nonsense, but I'm glad to see that proven so quickly.
We also had posters arguing that there was no need to acquire Edmundson given the Habs already had Chiarot ... Neglecting the fact that Chiarot and Edmundson would play on different pairings.
Funny how the people who didn't like the Edmundson acquisition seem to be the same ones who were whining about Chiarot, Danault, Byron, Armia and MB........maybe they should consider the fact that they don't understand the game instead of constantly moving goalposts to support their increasingly absurd bias.
This was a very good team from the start that was crippled by terrible play from their 10 million dollar goalie, injuries and Covid.
Once the negative momentum started it was tough to reel it in given the circumstances which was compounded by a mass coaching change with out practice time to implement a new system.
The fact that it is so hard for those who were wrong to admit it is shameful and they are only embarrassing themselves further with their amendments and caveats.
He's still our most reliable defenseman, IMO. And unfortunately our leading defenseman in scoring....Great blind pass on that 3rd goal.