That's not better than Markov + Emelin lolHope he signs.
Chiarot-Weber
Edmundson-Petry
Romanov-Fleury
Kulak
Pretty solid compared to what we iced for the last 10 years.
The JE thread keeps rolling along...
imagine if we land Laine!
The JE thread keeps rolling along...
imagine if we land Laine!
Markov-Subban was arguably the best pairing in the league. Petry was also pretty solid despite his worse stats.Hope he signs.
Chiarot-Weber
Edmundson-Petry
Romanov-Fleury
Kulak
Pretty solid compared to what we iced for the last 10 years.
That's not better than Markov + Emelin lol
We could acquire a 7th in 2022 for a 7th in 2022 and there would probably be at least a Part 2 for the thread.
Im talking Chariot + Edmun is not better than Markov Emelin.List the pairings and what year you are referring too? Markov, Subban, Emelin and then who? You have to pick a certain point in time too?
Markov-Subban was arguably the best pairing in the league
Markov-Subban was arguably the best pairing in the league
We also had Petry. Ask Dallas how it's working out for them by having the best 3 man d unit in the league and little depth after that.Yes but then crap after that.
The only minus at that time , when we traded for Petry , he was not like he was right now which is weird because he was already like 26~We also had Petry. Ask Dallas how it's working out for them by having the best 3 man d unit in the league and little depth after that.
Petry was still a solid top 4 dman at that time though. I remember being stoked that we resigned him, he was a great player that suffered playing on a garbage team.The only minus at that time , when we traded for Petry , he was not like he was right now which is weird because he was already like 26~
Im talking Chariot + Edmun is not better than Markov Emelin.
If you want to add weber with chariot and Subban with Markov , I still pick Subban for sure. Subban was always great in Montreal.
We are not progressing at all in our D squad , only Weber and Petry getting older
still is suffering on a garbage teamPetry was still a solid top 4 dman at that time though. I remember being stoked that we resigned him, he was a great player that suffered playing on a garbage team.
Dont worry i remember all awful Bergevin drafts. Juulsen for me is done and Brook is mehIt's pointless to talk about one pairing and I see more value to the overall pairings. We are fine on the back end. Weber and Petry are around for a while yet and we have 7 or more guys who have to develop so it's dumb to be pessimistic on that. Let me guess... Remember Beaulieu and Tinordi? Beaulieu and Tinordi are more like Brook and Juulsen types.
It's not holding him back though lol. Edmonton was and is a whole new level of bad.still is suffering on a garbage team
We also had Petry. Ask Dallas how it's working out for them by having the best 3 man d unit in the league and little depth after that.
That's true , wondering why Edmonton let him go for a 2nd lolIt's not holding him back though lol. Edmonton was and is a whole new level of bad.
Our defense of:Not sure what your exact point is cause I'm late to this conversation. But if you are asking me the importance of having 3 solid pairings? You don't need to convince me
Will always miss Subban being on the ice when habs scored a goal jumping in his teammate or when he scored and Markov was doing his russian face but at the end he smiled with him. Which was rare for Markov lolOur defense of:
Markov-Subban
Emelin-Petry
Beaulieu-Gonchar
was pretty damn good. Much better than what we have now.