BrokerD
Registered User
- Apr 13, 2012
- 1,164
- 1,323
Who picked the 3 stars in Nashville last night, Subban? How was KC not a star?
I don't think it was subban, he was too busy guaranteeing a game 6 victory
Who picked the 3 stars in Nashville last night, Subban? How was KC not a star?
you guys are now at Leaf fan levels of planning the parade.A team can also petition the commissioner to add names if extenuating circumstances kept them from playing. Unlikely they do it for Dano, but they might for Rosie especially if he gets a few more games in before the finals.
We apparently are slowly getting worse. Rosie isn't the player Perrault Is. Niku isn't half the player enstrom is. Poolman isn't a 1/3 the player Myers is. Neither Connor or ehlers are half as good as wheeler or Perrault. You'd think this is our last kick at the can
Why is it that the CBC crew roots for Nashville? A broadcaster should call the games and commentate neutral.
Isn't it great being a fan when you are only 1 of 6 teams that has a chance to win the cup. A win tomorrow and we will be down to the final 4. Everything is worth speculating about as we count down the hours between games. As long as you keep it on your own board of course. I wouldn't speculate on such things in the open jungle.you guys are now at Leaf fan levels of planning the parade.
stawppp
And put your pants on one leg at atimeaJust have to focus on the task at hand. Just play this one game, one shift at a time.
Why is it that the CBC crew roots for Nashville? A broadcaster should call the games and commentate neutral.
Enough with the Hendricks crap.
He did not play last night - if you want to discuss roster stuff, take it to the roster thread, or create a dedicated thread to discuss it. I've already issued a warning, edited, deleted posts, etc. Any further Hendricks discussion in this thread will simply be deleted.
It's like herding cats sometimes. I love you guys and gals, but...
Why is it that the CBC crew roots for Nashville? A broadcaster should call the games and commentate neutral.
As long as they remain objective/honest, they should lean towards the Jets.
Leaning toward one option over another is the very definition of bias, and the opposite of objective. They can't be both.
I think the announcers simply recognize things in both teams they like. They have said good things about both teams. Remember in an earlier series when a Minny player (I think it was) missed on a good goal chance and the announcer sounded downright disappointed, and the board reacted with outrage that an announcer should be so biased? Hughson sounded exactly the same when Connor missed on his breakaway a game or two ago, but no one here even recognized it. Face it, we're way more biased than the announcers. Biased to the point of blinkered, I'd say.