So, your contention is that it is a good move for the Jets to waste a good young prospect and a high pick on a player we have no chance of re-signing and won't change our fate this year?
Higher chance of re-signing him if he's already there
So, your contention is that it is a good move for the Jets to waste a good young prospect and a high pick on a player we have no chance of re-signing and won't change our fate this year?
Still not worth it at that asking price.Higher chance of re-signing him if he's already there
The Jets already have lots of smaller puck moving D-men, and the coach doesn’t want to play them. I don’t see how bringing in another one helps the situation.Vatanen makes a ton of sense, he could be a key partner for Heinola for the next couple of years if re-signed
KK was a reach because of position when he was drafted. What has he done to prove his worth? He's looking more like a weak 1c/2c ceiling now. Habs fans need to take it down 20% on this kid.I believe this is bad for the Habs, sure Heinola has shown promise and KK had a bad season but not to the point where Heinola has become more valuable than KK and Petry is way more valuable than Perreault who is a cap dump
KK was a reach because of position when he was drafted. What has he done to prove his worth? He's looking more like a weak 1c/2c ceiling now. Habs fans need to take it down 20% on this kid.