Tobias Kahun
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2017
- 43,016
- 52,862
He watches them, he just doesn’t understand what’s going onMaybe you should try actually watching at least some of the games?
He watches them, he just doesn’t understand what’s going onMaybe you should try actually watching at least some of the games?
Maybe he is being sarcastic considering Yama was scoring nicely with McD and Kane.He watches them, he just doesn’t understand what’s going on
McCurdy had JP ranked over Kane as a more important player that game in his grades. True story. He graded JP better than Kane that game
He also has JP as the prime target this season over Kane. JP 33 points in the top 6 on 54 games, Kane 26 points in 33. Yet McCurdy stresses JP is the prime cap allocation. What a dunce! McCurdy has always been on the level of Eklund when it comes to hockey talk, and you quoted him. oh brother
Does it feel good looking silly?
But oh wait, really looking forward to someone posting how JP's advanced stats were better in both games..let the tweets commence
100%.Kane is shooting at a 16% clip right now. His career average is around 10%. If you think allocating precious cap space to a 31 year old forward riding a heater playing with the best player in the world you've learned sweet FA from the last few years of Oilers hockey.
100%.
Kane is a luxury we likely can't afford to keep.
Pulju is a glue player that we absolutely must keep.
Kane is shooting at a 16% clip right now. His career average is around 10%. If you think allocating precious cap space to a 31 year old forward riding a heater playing with the best player in the world you've learned sweet FA from the last few years of Oilers hockey.
This combination of pushing Kane on a SP% heater supposedly boosted by McDavid and the line in the sand on Puljujarvi’s value without points recently, or pretty much always without McDavid is hilarious.
Sure, lets explain away actual goals to prop up your sad religion, and claim the exact same factor reduces value of one player and doesn’t reduce at all another player.
I have another theory, curious If there is a way to prove it: Puljujarvi is good when he can skate and use his physically large frame. I maintain this is most apparent and useful in transition either way, which is what is showing up on the shot metrics, not necessarily the “line driver” fallacy the stat heads drool over. Where he gets into trouble is behind the circles, he‘s not particularly effective and he’s especially uncreative on the wall, his positioning is average at best, he takes up space in the crease but isn’t especially effective in either shooting or setting up opponents there, the way a player like Hyman or Kane is, and obviously the finishing is Lucic level bad.
IDK man, you'd have to be dishonest or pretty dumb to think that mentioning Kane's obvious SH% heater is "explaining away" anything or is about "reducing the value" of a player. Sounds like you're not able to look at this stuff without bringing emotions into it.This combination of pushing Kane on a SP% heater supposedly boosted by McDavid and the line in the sand on Puljujarvi’s value without points recently, or pretty much always without McDavid is hilarious.
Sure, lets explain away actual goals to prop up your sad religion, and claim the exact same factor reduces value of one player and doesn’t reduce at all another player.
I like Kane as much as the next guy and want him re-signed, but him being on a SP% heater is actually fact. It was fact when Kassian had a SP% heater which of couse, massively declined after he re-signed that juicy contract of his. JP long term is a much better move for the Oilers, but I'd love to bring Kane back too assuming the money works.This combination of pushing Kane on a SP% heater supposedly boosted by McDavid and the line in the sand on Puljujarvi’s value without points recently, or pretty much always without McDavid is hilarious.
Sure, lets explain away actual goals to prop up your sad religion, and claim the exact same factor reduces value of one player and doesn’t reduce at all another player.
I have another theory, curious If there is a way to prove it: Puljujarvi is good when he can skate and use his physically large frame. I maintain this is most apparent and useful in transition either way, which is what is showing up on the shot metrics, not necessarily the “line driver” fallacy the stat heads drool over. Where he gets into trouble is behind the circles, he‘s not particularly effective and he’s especially uncreative on the wall, his positioning is average at best, he takes up space in the crease but isn’t especially effective in either shooting or setting up opponents there, the way a player like Hyman or Kane is, and obviously the finishing is Lucic level bad.
I don't think comparing Kane to Kassian is a good comparison. Kane has legitimately produced throughout his career with whomever he plays with and has proved durable. Kassian had a hot streak for 15 games ONCE with McDavid, but really has done nothing but float and get injured the last few years.I like Kane as much as the next guy and want him re-signed, but him being on a SP% heater is actually fact. It was fact when Kassian had a SP% heater which of couse, massively declined after he re-signed that juicy contract of his. JP long term is a much better move for the Oilers, but I'd love to bring Kane back too assuming the money works.
IDK man, you'd have to be dishonest or pretty dumb to think that mentioning Kane's obvious SH% heater is "explaining away" anything or is about "reducing the value" of a player. Sounds like you're not able to look at this stuff without bringing emotions into it.
Nice goal by Pulju, do you think?Dishonest and dumb is refering to Kanes shooting % as his primary value while acting like the guy hasn't gained the zone all by himself several times a game. Or skating the puck out of trouble or taking on dmen to make a play
Meanwhile one would be hardpressed to recall JP taking 5 strides with the puck in the last 20 games, or taking on a defender or going around one with puck control.
Your bs sh% theory is nonsense
I don't mind it, but I wonder if they can get him for a bit less because of the low spots of production. Not that he hasn't been effective, but guys are still largely paid for the boxcars they put up.IMO they should offer Jesse Nuge money (5.125M per) for 8 years, and be pretty happy if he signs the deal.
OK so Kane is on a heater because he's with McDavid but Pulju is a glue guy and not boosted by McDavid. Can you see the complete lack of logic in that statement?IDK man, you'd have to be dishonest or pretty dumb to think that mentioning Kane's obvious SH% heater is "explaining away" anything or is about "reducing the value" of a player. Sounds like you're not able to look at this stuff without bringing emotions into it.
Kane is the same age as Barrie, 10months older than Hyman and about a year older than Nuge all of which got long term deals with Oilers just now.Kane is shooting at a 16% clip right now. His career average is around 10%. If you think allocating precious cap space to a 31 year old forward riding a heater playing with the best player in the world you've learned sweet FA from the last few years of Oilers hockey.