Well you can choose to believe that, but you cannot deny how fatigue may also actually be a factor.I just think it was a convenient excuse to lower the responsibilities of a young player when the games became more meaningful.
it's coach-speak for "I didn't trust him because he's young, i'd rather trust veterans who tire at the same rate".
From what I saw, he was looked sloppier out there and Julien is not the one who made me see this.
Not at all. I put KK's rookie year more in line with Galch's especially considering his return from a year off. Kopitar was a beast, KK is not comparable to him because he played less and had crappier wingers at 18. Come on now.I know they don't...but we're just using comparables, which is each player's respective rookie seasons.
You had mentioned earlier that you'd have been more impressed by Kotkaniemi's rookie season had he produced 60pts like Kopitar did in his rookie season.
But I don't think you took context into account here...because using context, Kotkaniemi's rookie season was on par with Kopitar's.
Sure. But his offensive game needs quite a bit of growing if he is to be a top line center.Disagree about his offensive game being mature enough, but again, it's all relative...he was a very young 18yr old. No one was expecting a finished product here, but I think we saw a lot of things that most 18yr olds just don't do at the NHL level.
Not at all...I said a few times, I don't think you're being unreasonable.
But I do think you should be way more excited or assured based on what we saw last year.
This team has a lot of question marks moving forward...
Kotkaniemi's potential as a 1st liner, shouldn't be one of them, at least not IMO.
It is a question mark whether you want to admit it or not. KK is not a shoe in to be a top center. Not to me. He needs to develop his offensive game more for that to happen.