Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Says who?So...he's not as good of a prospect as Pettersson. So what?
Says who?So...he's not as good of a prospect as Pettersson. So what?
How would you know? You thought Poehling was the best C outside the NHL last year.The hype is getting a bit out of control. The guy lacks speed, strength, elite puck skills. Look at Pettersson and tell me Kotka has that upside. Not trying to be a Debbie downer here.
Well, I think so, for one. And most of HFboards would probably agree. I don't know why that matters. Doesn't mean Kotkaniemi isn't a great prospect. I'll gladly be wrong about this, but we won't know for a few years.Says who?
Says who?
Well, I think so, for one. And most of HFboards would probably agree. I don't know why that matters. Doesn't mean Kotkaniemi isn't a great prospect. I'll gladly be wrong about this, but we won't know for a few years.
LOL...no.
Look, I've been looking at Jesperi since last December. I had him 3rd before the whole of HFBoards. I'm pretty high on him.
Stop with the nonsense comparisons. Jesperi will be Jesperi. He's much taller, bigger, than Jonathan, but he doesn't have Toews foot speed or shifty stick handling. They are very different players.
Mats Sundin has been my comparison since the start.
North American center prospect.How would you know? You thought Poehling was the best C outside the NHL last year.
Did you read the post I quoted? Guy said Kotkas ceiling is higher than anyone outside of Sid, McDavid, Ovechkin and Geno.So...he's not as good of a prospect as Pettersson. So what?
The hype is getting a bit out of control. The guy lacks speed, strength, elite puck skills. Look at Pettersson and tell me Kotka has that upside. Not trying to be a Debbie downer here.
Would he not hit that same proverbial wall if he didn't play in the NHL this year and came over next year? Same thing with hitting a slump.Not sure how you can say he lacks elite puck skills... Have you watched him?
For any player to move in/out of, and create, space the way he dies with the pucknon his stick demands elite puck control... Let alone an 18 year old playing in his first dozen games.
Let's see what his strength & speed look like in 14 months before getting caught up in physical comparisons to Pettersson, or anyone else for that matter.
Heck, I'm still not fully convinced the NHL is the best spot for him this year, and would fully expect he'll hit a wall, and slump badly at some point in the season, as the grind takes its toll.
Maybe i'm forgetting Galchenyuk's rookie year, but i'm seeing more involvement in all 3 zones with Kotkaniemi than I ever did with Galchenyuk.But potential-wise? Like Galch when he broke in, JKO is showing glimpses of being a truly elite player.... Let's just hope we don't ruin his development curve the way we did with Galch.
Theres more to hockey than just being reliable in all three zones.Would he not hit that same proverbial wall if he didn't play in the NHL this year and came over next year? Same thing with hitting a slump.
15yr veterans hit slumps, why would keeping him away from the NHL make him less likely to hit a slump?
I'm not being sarcastic btw, truly curious to get your point of view on this as it's something i've often seen repeated and i'm not quite sure I get the logic behind it.
Maybe i'm forgetting Galchenyuk's rookie year, but i'm seeing more involvement in all 3 zones with Kotkaniemi than I ever did with Galchenyuk.
I saw maybe more natural finishing ability with Galchenyuk, but otherwise, I've found Kotkaniemi better prepared.
Perhaps that's just recency bias at play though.
Ok???Theres more to hockey than just being reliable in all three zones.
Theres more to hockey than just being reliable in all three zones.
The four pillars to build a teamAttitude?
Still, Petterson is looking to have the potential of being the second best player in the world. I'll be happy with young Bobby being a top ten centerPettersson is closer to 2 years older than Kotka.
Kotka already was taking extra skating workouts this summer, in few years he'll look different I bet.
Anyways Kotka is going to be more of a 2way C in the model of Barkov.
Theres more to hockey than just being reliable in all three zones.
Blame Lefebvre! fixed that for you...Step 1: Overrate our prospects.
Step 2: Blame management when they don’t reach expectations.
Step 3: Repeat.
One thing about Kotka though is he thinks the game at a similar level and they do both play very much alike. What Kotka lacks in puck skills ans creativity compared to Pettersson, he might one day make up for it with size and strength. That said, its an easier sell than Necas > Pettersson, but still a tough sell.