Todd Parchment
Registered User
- Apr 5, 2018
- 1,217
- 636
Would he be an available player if he waived his NTC and what assets would the Wild want for him?
I doubt he'd waive (he's got deep roots here at this point and wants to stay pretty badly since his wife has a successful local radio career going now), but his NTC is a limited one. He has a 10 team NTC only.Would he be an available player if he waived his NTC and what assets would the Wild want for him?
What do you want from Anaheim for him?
I’d do a conditional 1st probably. Slides a year if no playoffs. And I’d want some retention. Maybe ARI 1st (playoff condition) and Fischer for Zucker with significant retention and a. Mid round pick.
Why would Guerin accept less than Fenton already essentially got? The only thing reportedly stopping that 1st + Frolik deal was a mix-up filing paperwork on the Calgary end.Well the price at the deadline last season was supposedly Frolik and a 1st.
Now that the Wild have a competent GM, I imagine the ask is a bit more reasonable than that
Probably not relevant since the GM (Fletcher/Fenton) and the guy running the draft table (Flahr) in 2016 and 2018 aren't with the team anymore. Even many of the scouts have probably turned over since 2018.Bode Wilde/Bellows/1st rounder. Do it Lou. Remember too Minnesota wanted both of those guys in the two drafts when the Isles grabbed them first
Why are you throwing Wilde around like that after the season he just had? curious. No thanks.Bode Wilde/Bellows/1st rounder. Do it Lou. Remember too Minnesota wanted both of those guys in the two drafts when the Isles grabbed them first
When a bad team trades a win now player that’s how it works though.I mean I would love to see a deal that doesn’t involve 3 lesser assets for him for once. Let’s start there
I get that, but the point is I don’t want a bunch of lesser prospects, just one top prospectWhen a bad team trades a win now player that’s how it works though.
No contending team is going to trade a win now piece to a rebuilding team for a win now player. It’ll almost certainly be for a collection of picks/prospects.
Yeah that’s fair and it’s the route they should go imo.I get that, but the point is I don’t want a bunch of lesser prospects, just one too prospect
That is a very intriguing deal and one I would acceptYeah that’s fair and it’s the route they should go imo.
I’d trade Newhook for him as an Avs fan but Sakic likely wouldn’t. Billy G probably would prefer to ship him out if the division too.
Probably best to stay away from any thread that involves him than.I mean I would love to see a deal that doesn’t involve 3 lesser assets for him for once. Let’s start there
Yeah that’s fair and it’s the route they should go imo.
I’d trade Newhook for him as an Avs fan but Sakic likely wouldn’t. Billy G probably would prefer to ship him out if the division too.
That's not closeI’d do a conditional 1st probably. Slides a year if no playoffs. And I’d want some retention. Maybe ARI 1st (playoff condition) and Fischer for Zucker with significant retention and a. Mid round pick.
The Wild took Kunin 4 picks ahead of BellowsBode Wilde/Bellows/1st rounder. Do it Lou. Remember too Minnesota wanted both of those guys in the two drafts when the Isles grabbed them first