gorangers0525
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2014
- 2,751
- 687
The people that are upset about this are the ones who have absolutely no grasp of how to evaluate a hockey player. Thinking Stoll has been anything other than crappy is just letting your bias show. Let's please get over the "gritty, savvy veteran" syndrome.
Tanner Glass has been better than Stoll in his games this year, and it's not difficult to see that. We also have a plethora of dudes who can take a face off.
Odd in that our #1 C is injured and not coming back for another month and we waive a C?
Am i just reading too much into this????
I don't want either of them . I'd rather dress seven defenseman tbhThe people that are upset about this are the ones who have absolutely no grasp of how to evaluate a hockey player. Thinking Stoll has been anything other than crappy is just letting your bias show. Let's please get over the "gritty, savvy veteran" syndrome.
Tanner Glass has been better than Stoll in his games this year, and it's not difficult to see that. We also have a plethora of dudes who can take a face off.
Nash-Brass-MZA
Kreider-Stepan-Miller
Lindberg-Hayes-Stalberg
Glass-Moore-Fast
Etem
Hopefully Butcher comes over from the KHL, so it becomes:
Nash-Brass-MZA
Kreider-Stepan-Miller
Lindberg-Hayes-Butcher
Stalberg-Moore-Fast
Etem/Glass
I don't want either of them . I'd rather dress seven defenseman tbh
Stoll AND Glass have to go. I think the Rangers can run a decent 4th line without them when the team is healthy.
I guess it doesnt matter too much but why would they waive a guy who's good at faceoffs? Of course someone claimed him he's cheap.
Glass still on the team is ridiculious
I guess it doesnt matter too much but why would they waive a guy who's good at faceoffs? Of course someone claimed him he's cheap.
Glass still on the team is ridiculious