- Aug 28, 2011
- 16,356
- 20,040
I think this is now a new low for the organization as a whole. Really depressing. What a shit year to be a hockey fan in this city.
Consent to being picked up and go to a hotel room is not consent to what she states happened after.I dont know...but she consented to get picked up and go to a hotel room with him...Its going to be a he said/she said type of deal.
In a criminal trial, all of that matters. The issue would be whether or not there is reasonable doubt about consent. But criminal law is not employment law or contract law. The Canucks, if satisfied that the allegations are generally true, can terminate his contract for cause. The NHLPA could try to challenge that but likely would rather avoid taking on such a fight. And once he's out of Vancouver, the nature of the allegations are such that no other team will go near him. Their fans would never allow it and rightly so. I haven't wandered off to the main board yet but I suspect that will be the prevailing narrative.I dont know...but she consented to get picked up and go to a hotel room with him...Its going to be a he said/she said type of deal.
Totally agree. I was only using his example to show that results don’t automatically indicate guilt or innocence. He practically admitted to performing non-consensual acts but the whole story was forgotten and he continued to play high level football.I think you need to draw a distinction between guys like a Ronaldo our own Jake Virtanen. Jake is an NHL player sure but you can't really consider him "high profile".
That was my initial thought when reading. But who knows, maybe more comes out going forward.Reading the story online it really looks like it'll be a he said vs she said story. Can't see any legal repercussion taken place even if Jake is guilty.
no i meant like NFL player. I am blanking on the name though.
Bingo,I hope the RCMP, team and league investigate this thoroughly and get to the truth of the matter.
Disturbing allegations, to be sure.
After all the things that have happened to the team this season..This is like a cherry on top.and yet another public distraction to follow Jake around..Its stupid to jump to conclusions on these things though..The whole Patrick Kane episode comes to mind.
Even if it's a false accusation, Jake put himself in a position for it to happen. I don't want to see him wearing a Canucks uniform again.
In a criminal trial, all of that matters. The issue would be whether or not there is reasonable doubt about consent. But criminal law is not employment law or contract law. The Canucks, if satisfied that the allegations are generally true, can terminate his contract for cause. The NHLPA could try to challenge that but likely would rather avoid taking on such a fight. And once he's out of Vancouver, the nature of the allegations are such that no other team will go near him. Their fans would never allow it and rightly so. I haven't wandered off to the main board yet but I suspect that will be the prevailing narrative.
the fact that Virtanen is even a Canuck BEFORE these allegations prove that to be untruethis regime has shown zero tolerance for perceived character issues and drama.
As much as I don't want to chime in about the behavior of somebody I don't know, I will say that Jake has had issues with maturity and decision-making since he was a prospect. I wouldn't be surprised if the allegation was true but also wouldn't be shocked if this was just another in a string of bad judgment calls that look worse than they really are.