Not every coach has had something against Nail. In fact Kreuger, Nelson, got the best out of Nail and Nail enjoyed very much playing for those coaches. Its not too much of a secret what Nail feels about Eakins.
But if you need to falsely generalize to suit your argument you should recognize holes in your argument.
As for Drai he's the outlier player in this lineup. A guy that offseason substantially improved his game. Which no other player in this lineup does. Sure, I could wish Yak does the same but no other team does and they still have their cushy lines insured all season.
Nuge just had a horrendous production year for a guy that has been slotted in topsix all season. Yet nothing ever happens there. No demotion, lol they actually move Drai, who has been better than Nuge and more deserving all year, to wing, sot that Special NUge can play Center.
if you think there isn't some differential treatment here and a few sacred cows I don't know what to tell you. Nuge is obviously inferior to McDavid or Drai and yet the team still wants to insure a top C position for him. just because. with that player, who finished with 34pts, theres no play your way into the topsix rotation expectation. Its guaranteed. When do you ever see Nuge anywhere else. His pts/60mins production is as bad as Yaks and his GA are worse.
I haven't commented about anyone elses' current years or past years, only nails and drais. When you're forced to resort to bringing up other players to attempt to defend him it shows a lack of substance in your arguments, especially regarding RNH because post injury he was on the third line with Leon and Mcdavid composing the top two centers, and even during this awful season of his he still has 4 more goals, 11 more points a +6 in 5 less games, while going through his injuries. He also faced much better competition then Yakupov as the coach decided he was fit to play those minutes over Yakupov... Drai was moved to the wing because that line was really good earlier in the season prior to RNHs injury, it has nothing to do with Nail.
I'll respond to both of these at the same time. RNH although in my mind not a good enough player in the first place, is still a much better NHL player then Nail Yakupov. Any statistic, any measure, any eye test will show you that as well. RNH throughout his career has been facing MUCH better competition and faring much better because coaches can and do trust him in that role. There is a reason nail is spoon fed minutes against low quality players and does abysmal.Each and every coach we have had has given him these minutes because he is simply not good enough for a top 6 role or more specifically, we somehow always have better players then him for that role. Even in his season under Krueger, who I already analyzed and showed you the huge anomaly in a lockout shortened season(which you choose to ignore) this was the same. RNH is, has been and will be the better player. If Nail yakupov was anywhere near his draft pedigree he would have "differential treatment" too...Nuge is obviously inferior to McDavid or Drai and yet the team still wants to insure a top C position for him. just because. with that player, who finished with 34pts, theres no play your way into the topsix rotation expectation. Its guaranteed. When do you ever see Nuge anywhere else. His pts/60mins production is as bad as Yaks and his GA are worseNot every coach has had something against Nail. In fact Kreuger, Nelson, got the best out of Nail and Nail enjoyed very much playing for those coaches. Its not too much of a secret what Nail feels about Eakins.
Stats under Nelson?
Nails stateline was 81 14 19 33 -35
RNH for comparison 76 24 32 56 -12
Cmon man, you gotta look at this subjectively here, Im not attacking Nail and you don't need to act like criticisms of nail are ones of you or your opinion, they are my opinion but the difference between us is mine are backed up by facts whereas yours are out of passion.