BroadwayJay*
Guest
Nick Leddy isn't Chris Chelios.
I just went and looked up Chris Chelios' playing weight: 190 lbs.
Nick Leddy is listed at 194 lbs.
Nick Leddy isn't Chris Chelios.
That's not what she told me.
He didn't say "we have no room for Nick Leddy" and I responded with "well we'd have room for Chris Chelios".
Nick Leddy... isn't Chris Chelios.
You're either ignoring the point or missing it...
On the subject of comparing size of players from the past to now, one has to be cautious as the average NHLer is much bigger than those of the past. So a 6'0" defenseman from the 80s was actually bigger, relatively speaking in comparison to his peers, than a 6'0" defenseman from today is.
I remember a quote from Mark Messier, shortly after he retired. Paraphrasing, but it was something to the effect of "When I came into the league I was a powerforward, but when I left it I was a finesse player". It was in reference to the fact that when he broke into the league, 6'1 and 205 lbs. was considered big and imposing, but by the time he retired that was just your average player.
You're either ignoring the point or missing it...
Hey, is there any room on that elevator?
Nah, man. We're full.
What if I gave you a million dollars?
Ok, we can probably squeeze you in.
Hey, the blueline looks a bit smallish. Might make it tough adding another smaller player.
What if we added Paul Coffey?
Ok, we could probably make that work.
We really can't hide another smallish defender on this roster.
He didn't say it would be tough to add another smaller player. He said we CAN'T add another smaller player.
Wait so Nick Leddy is Chris Chelios reincarnate?
No Nick Leddy is LITERALLY Chris Chelios.
Heh. Alright. This all makes sense now.
Don't use absolutes in debate...it gets you beat every time.
(see what I did there?)
Can't. Not "would be tough". Can't.
What if he had said, "We really can't hide another smallish defender on this roster, UNLESS IT'S A HALL OF FAME PLAYER WE TIMEWARP INTO OUR ROSTER!" ?
Well, Karlsson, Subban, and Keith don't need to be timewarped; which is why I also mentioned them and I don't think there would be any complaints about any of those guys being on our roster.
Ok. Strike that, then.
How about, "We really can't hide another smallish defender on this roster, UNLESS IT'S A HALL OF FAME PLAYER WE TIMEWARP INTO OUR ROSTER OR A NORRIS TROPHY WINNER" ?
I purposed cited Norris Trophy winners to point out how absurd the statement was, that we can't take on someone of that size.
Well, according to: http://www.allheight.com/2013/03/spiderman-peter-parker-height-how-tall.html , Spiderman is 5' 10", so I guess we could find room for him too.
Well, we'd find room for Marc-Edouard Vlasic (6'1") too. Ryan McDonagh (6'1") as well. Mark Giordano (6'0") also. Likewise Ryan Suter (6'1").
So you'll have to qualify further.
I purposed cited Norris Trophy winners to point out how absurd the statement was, that we can't take on someone of that size.
Again, not everyone of the same height is the same build.
By small, I think it's fairly obvious that people are referring to physical strength, and not to height. Do you truly believe that Leddy is as strong as guys like Vlasic, Mcdonagh, Suter or Giordano? Otherwise, these examples don't really have a lot of relevance.
It should also be fairly obvious that we can always make room on the roster for a legit top pairing D-man who happens to be smaller. But since Leddy is not a legit top pairing Dman, and it's questionable if he's even a top 4 Dman, these still aren't relevent.
+1, but the combination package is most desirable as wingspan helps gap control, and general physics is that the bigger mass wins in collisions.Again, not everyone of the same height is the same build.
By small, I think it's fairly obvious that people are referring to physical strength, and not to height.