Is this a legal shootout goal?

Discussion in 'National Hockey League Talk' started by Mez, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:37 PM.

  1. Mez

    Mez Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2017
    Messages:
    4,382
    Likes Received:
    3,540
    Trophy Points:
    117
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,181,148
    Gender:
    Male


    Sick dangles regardless.
     
    llamateizer and Pizza!Pizza! like this.
  2. Jacob

    Jacob as seen on TV

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    42,042
    Likes Received:
    9,432
    Trophy Points:
    235
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Shouldn’t be. He not only stops forward progress but begins moving away from the net.
     
  3. Pia8988

    Pia8988 Registered User

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    12,034
    Likes Received:
    5,745
    Trophy Points:
    175
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Nope. Bad call
     
    Oryxo, Crow and berlin like this.
  4. haveandare

    haveandare Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    16,754
    Likes Received:
    4,284
    Trophy Points:
    186
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Location:
    New York
    I didn't think it was legal from the angle behind Panarin. The angle from his front looked like sideways motion.
     
    egelband likes this.
  5. Shocker

    Shocker Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2019
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    46
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Bad call, shouldn't have been a goal.
     
  6. a mangy Meowth

    a mangy Meowth NOTENOUGHBREWER fan

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    8,334
    Likes Received:
    3,125
    Trophy Points:
    142
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Denver
    Nah it went backward a bit imo
     
  7. Teppo

    Teppo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,255
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    I don't get how this could be the explanation? Were they watching a different replay?
    [​IMG]
     
  8. IlikeEich

    IlikeEich Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    3,052
    Likes Received:
    3,668
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Went backwards twice imo, shouldn’t have counted. Sick dangles, but that’s why that rule exists, kinda an unfair advantage.
     
  9. Anglesmith

    Anglesmith Setting up the play?

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2012
    Messages:
    41,819
    Likes Received:
    7,077
    Trophy Points:
    162
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Occupation:
    Scientist
    Location:
    Victoria
    Obviously, it isn't possible to conclusively say based on that one angle, but it definitely looks to me like it shouldn't have counted.
     
  10. Frank Drebin

    Frank Drebin Registered Bootlicker Sponsor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    25,550
    Likes Received:
    8,135
    Trophy Points:
    232
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Occupation:
    coloring
    Location:
    Edmonton
    By the letter of the law those datsyuk dekes wouldn't be legal.

    This was a joke, no way it should have counted
     
  11. tny760

    tny760 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    7,932
    Likes Received:
    5,764
    Trophy Points:
    111
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    that's like, right on the ragged edge of what i consider to be "just puck handling", he was going pretty parallel though i think it's a stretch to call it "backwards" given the camera angle parallax

    just a million ways to interpret the rule cause all it really says is the puck has to remain in motion towards the goal line

    every stickhandle pulls the puck forward and back so that's a big ol grey area. i guess you could argue that a puck travelling parallel to the goal line would technically be moving away from the goal line once it's outside of the post's plane
     
  12. Matty Sundin

    Matty Sundin Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,079
    Likes Received:
    593
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Don't like it but it's legal. It annoys me when Patrick Kane does something similar as well.
     
  13. Chrisinroch

    Chrisinroch Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    361
    Trophy Points:
    100
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,295,238
    Location:
    Vouvray
    The puck clearly moves backwards. No goal
     
  14. TheGooooch

    TheGooooch Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    18,243
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    126
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Doesn’t look legal at all.
     
  15. McGarnagle

    McGarnagle Yes.

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2017
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    10,500
    Trophy Points:
    141
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    That's a bad, bad call.
     
  16. Ho Kogan

    Ho Kogan Spirits and Cosmos

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,626
    Likes Received:
    657
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 100,000
    Location:
    London, ON
    He clearly pulled that puck back on the glove side.

    Lousy call, but it's in NY. Go figure.
     
  17. Teppo

    Teppo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,255
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    I thought about that too, but I think while the puck is pulled backwards with regular stick handling, a player is moving forward towards the net - in some cases extremely slow, and also in some cases almost parallel. But in this case, not only was the puck pulled back, but the skater was beyond parallel and moving away from the goal line.
     
    TatteredTornNFrayed likes this.
  18. LeafsNation75

    LeafsNation75 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    27,063
    Likes Received:
    5,798
    Trophy Points:
    186
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Those moves by Panarin reminded me of this shootout goal Mitch Marner had against Ottawa, which they thought should not count and after a review it still did.

     
  19. Hockey4Lyfe

    Hockey4Lyfe Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2018
    Messages:
    3,237
    Likes Received:
    1,457
    Trophy Points:
    90
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    According to the rule, how in the hell does the puck keep constant motion towards the opponents goal line. It went both sideways and a little backwards from what I can tell
     
  20. Breakers

    Breakers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,124
    Likes Received:
    2,886
    Trophy Points:
    126
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Location:
    Denver Colorado
    I dont think the NHL has a camera directly along the goal line

    this puck looks dangerously close to actually going backwards a bit
    0:33 of that video shows the puck dip below the arch of the goal crease
    then the puck moves back above the arch.
     
    McNurse likes this.
  21. tarheelhockey

    tarheelhockey Highest Boss

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    62,703
    Likes Received:
    51,280
    Trophy Points:
    225
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Location:
    The Triangle
    Already twice this month I’ve seen two blatantly illegal shootout goals counted.

    I don’t like ragging on the refs, I really don’t. But you’ve got FOUR guys watching ONE shooter from all angles and this stuff still gets missed?
     
    Tryamw and PatriceBergeronFan like this.
  22. aufheben

    aufheben as if

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2013
    Messages:
    44,041
    Likes Received:
    12,950
    Trophy Points:
    205
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,478,307
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Definitely not. :laugh:

    But the Wild kind of deserved to lose the shootout after selecting Zuccarello to shoot last. He's a 49% 25-26 shooter in his career. Plus he definitely would have owned the Rangers there. Didn't even have a chance to shoot.

    I don't know what this means lol
     
    UnSandvich likes this.
  23. ottawa

    ottawa Avatar of the Year*

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    30,330
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    190
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orleans/Toronto
    It's not technically legal but there should be certain exceptions to this when it involves dangling.

    I'm OK with this goal.
     
    romba likes this.
  24. TheBluePenguin

    TheBluePenguin Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2015
    Messages:
    5,377
    Likes Received:
    4,088
    Trophy Points:
    160
    SB Cash:
    $ 6,375,794
    Location:
    St Louis
    That should not count, league needs to clear that's call up
     
  25. Mandar

    Mandar The Real Maven

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,869
    Likes Received:
    1,074
    Trophy Points:
    110
    SB Cash:
    $ 1,200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Financial Genius
    Location:
    The Tarheel State
    Gotta wonder why they all travelled back to NY just for the shootout, right? Go figure indeed.....
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"