Monahan is a very good complementary offensive center and a top 31 center, but he's not a play driver and I can't see him outplaying most top 31 centers head to head in the playoffs. You can probably win a cup with him at 1C, but you probably need a similar level center as your 2C who actually can win those matchups. Backlund is a good defensive center, but I don't think he's quite good enough offensively to be that guy.
That's a real issue right there. If you ask me, your best center isn't supposed to be complimentary. If you got a center who can win those matchups, it means he's going to be your most played C in the playoffs, technically making him your 1C.
Sure, he can be the #1C on a team that wins the Cup. You probably want a guy almost as good as your #2C, though.
Disagree. I can't see a team winning the cup with Monahan as their best center. He can be the center on your best offensive line, but not the best center. There's a difference.
I can't think of a cup winner in recent memory that had their best center struggling against other top centers. They all had someone who could put up points and confidently go toe to toe with the opposing teams best. That's what 1C is supposed to do for your team - to be the guy who you can throw out there and feel confident no matter what the situation.
The question isn't is Monahan a #1C on a cup winner.
It's is he a #1C period.
That's undeniable.
Also agree. Monahan is still good enough offensively to be the #1 guy on a team trying to make the playoffs.
I guess i would classify him as a low end 1C. Technically 1C yes, if i want to win the cup no. That's low end for me.