duh, obviously they have something to do with it. Why would you ask something so silly like that.Interesting. So Babcock, Rielly, Nylander and Marner have nothing to do with it?
They do, although Ristolainen is the most overrated player in the NHL and I'd say their defence is quite weak both from a defensive and offensive standpoint.Does Buffalo not have any good players?
Definitely not lazy, but he could improve his hockey IQ a lot.
He seems to have quite the ego which is actually normal and honestly expected for a player of his caliber. He definitely isn't the culprit of Buffalo's problems.
I'd say he's more unfocused than lazy. But you could say one leads to the other so...
"Rest of his team is trash" doesn't hold up when Eichel literally gets the best QoT on the team and most good players play better away from him.
No they wouldn't. Mario Lemieux was on some good teams and a lot of people called him lazy.
And they were wrong to do so.
I see Eichel in a similar position to a guy like Kessel, guy who became targeted for extra unwarranted criticism because of poor management/coaching decisions
He already got the GM/coach fired, that's a poor excuse!
Man, this is a good thread. PPG pace and clearly the best person on the ice night in and night out. And he's underwhelming. And he's a cancer cuz some people think he got Bylsma fired. And he's arrogant and lazy.
This is hilarious.
I mean, the Sabres are underwhelming for sure - but Eichel is by far the least underwhelming player on the team right now. I mean, like if you watch him.
Ok I'll give the eye test a try. He just cost his team last game by not picking up his man (sheary) in OT. Try and defend Eichel on that play please. It's literally the most lazy, floating play in hockey.
He doesn't want to win. If he did he would pay more attention and pick up his man.
Stuff like that is non-quantifiable, especially just by points. That's what you get by watching him.
Man, this is a good thread. PPG pace and clearly the best person on the ice night in and night out. And he's underwhelming. And he's a cancer cuz some people think he got Bylsma fired. And he's arrogant and lazy.
This is hilarious.
I mean, the Sabres are underwhelming for sure - but Eichel is by far the least underwhelming player on the team right now. I mean, like if you watch him.
Chances are I've been watching him for longer than you have. I see what his flaws are and I see what they aren't. Eichel needs to lead by example and it all starts with him. You can't float or half ass plays during the game because you don't have that luxury. Players on good teams have the luxury of being mediocre because they have teammates that can pick up the slack. I expect Jack Eichel to be a superstar and with the money he's about to get paid he's being treated like one in Buffalo. His play however hasn't been up to par. He hasn't even put up PPG yet. What justifies his $10 mil/ year? Atleast other players who make that money have hardware to back up their pay cheques. Eichel has literally won nothing in the NHL and yet is going to be a top 10 paid guy in the league.
When the Leafs were horrendous the year they won the lottery, the hardest working guy on the team was Nazem Kadri. He led the team with 17 goals and 45 points. He had no reason to care since he was playing with absolute plugs on his line while playing in a shutdown role. Add on to that fact, he had Babcock riding him every game expecting him to be better and get better. Kadri worked his butt off and earned a $4.5 million deal while being the BEST guy on the team. Now, Kadri is no where near Eichel in physical attributes or on ice talent but the man played with pride on a **** team. That same Nazem Kadri is on pace for b2b 30 goal seasons while playing a shutdown role. He stuck it out through the worst of times and worked his ass off to become the player he is today. This is a 2C/3C guy who isn't going to get named Captain or earn an 8 digit pay cheque. Buffalo has another guy who is very similar to Naz, his name is ROR. He's played his ass off even when the Sabres were atrocious. What's Jack's excuse?
Jack just turned 21. Nazem played 29 games when he was 20, and 21 games when he was 21. Nazem was 25 when he scored those 45 points while tanking.
But good point. I guess we'll have to ask him why he sucks.
The point is a player like Nazem Kadri was held to a higher standard by his coaches and organization and Nazem Kadri isn't and wasn't the future of the Leafs. Jack Eichel is the future of the Sabres and he's getting paid a buttload of money to be THE GUY. Yet there seems to be very limited accountability by the coaches or org. Those who did question him and his ways were kicked to the curb. All I heard last year was Bylsma this and Bylsma that. This year Bylsma isn't there anymore and Jack still hasn't changed his ways. He's still playing **** defensively and going MIA for long stretches of the game. His effort level needs to pick up big time. I'm still a big fan of the kid but he pisses me off with the way he plays sometimes.
Nah man I think you just made most of those up to make their fanbase look bad. Did the opposite thoughI am not about to dig through threads to point out the many times this has been said over the last few years and over the summer. My post wasn't meant to start a war here, it was just meant to highlight that at worst, Sabres fans think as a group these guys are equal to the Leafs, or at least did before the start of the year, when many had them as better.
Saying Eichel has a worse core to work with like the other poster was attempting to do throws the entire organization under the bus to save face on one player.
Nah man I think you just made most of those up to make their fanbase look bad. Did the opposite though
This is more like a Facebook post, than it is a comment on a hockey board. At least touch on one of what, when, or why. We already knew who. Maybe you thought it was a poll, and you just wanted us to know how you voted.Eichel isn't a superstar. He never will be one either.
Eichel isn't a superstar. He never will be one either.
Career high of 56 points.