PuckInTheNards
Registered User
- Feb 4, 2008
- 1,977
- 446
Playing for Minessota, I would say yes.
I don't understand why it always comes back to this. Minnesota is one of the largest hockey markets in the US. Cities like NY, LA, Philly, etc may be bigger cities but they aren't bigger hockey markets. The problem is the hockey media tends to live in an east coast or Canada bubble.That's the problem he's playing for Minnesota
I don't understand why it always comes back to this. Minnesota is one of the largest hockey markets in the US. Cities like NY, LA, Philly, etc may be bigger cities but they aren't bigger hockey markets. The problem is the hockey media tends to live in an east coast or Canada bubble.
You know exactly why it comes back to that all hockey fans do
The wild play a style that can make an average goalie into a star
You know exactly why it comes back to that all hockey fans do
The wild play a style that can make an average goalie into a star
Could win the Vezina this season (based on play up to now), probably should have won it 2 seasons ago (2014-2015) as well.
Dubnyk's problem that year was that he started as a backup and worked into a starter role (while Price was an established starter from the beginning), but his numbers were simply amazing.
2014-2015 Arizona 9-5-2 (103 pt pace in a backup role)
Dubnyk's win percentage here would've put the Coyotes 2nd place in their division. This was on a team that finished with 56 pts and would've been worst in the league if not for Dubnyk's wins (speculation was that Arizona traded Dubnyk to tank harder). For an apples to apples comparison, starter Mike Smith had a 14-42-5 on the exact same team (44 pt pace) meaning Dubs won 2.3x more than the Coyotes starting goalie.
2014-2015 Minnesota 27-9-2 (121 pt pace)
Put on a decent (not exactly world beating) team, Dubnyk wins at a rate that would've easily captured the President's trophy (winner that season was Rangers with 113 pts). Easily beats Kuemper and Backstrom
Doubters think that Dubnyk is a product of Minnesota's system, but that doesn't account for how he won so much on an awful Arizona team and completely outplayed other starters that year as well. Maybe he's simply a good goalie now and easily top 5 in the league.
Why wasn't Backstrom a star before he retired (he was great until about 2009- but because he was playing great)? Why isn't Keumper a star?
Bryzgalov?
Why just Dubnyk?
I know why, because he is playing AMAZING hockey right now. And he's saved our *** a bunch of times this year.
You know exactly why it comes back to that all hockey fans do
The wild play a style that can make an average goalie into a star
Backstrom was a star for a while, Bryz was a backup Keumper is also a backup
I don't know if I'd call Backstrom a star. He was a solid starter but never really top 5. HE was the one that benefited from the system, if anyone.
Bryz was actually our starter for a while, but never took off.
Same with Kuemper, we tried him as a starter, it didn't work, that's why we got Dubnyk.
Having an elite defense in front of him certainly helps, but as Kuemper and Bryzgalov have shown, it doesn't make an average goaltender a star. Dubnyk is the real deal and certainly a top 5 goalie in the league right now.
So you think that if Dubnyk was say a Leaf and had Hunwick and Polak on his D core, he'd put up similar numbers?
IF that is what you think know that Polak and Hunwick aee the worst D men in the NHL particularly Hunwick
That isn't what he suggested, at all.
For the record, I think every goalie would give up more goals on a bad defense than a good one.
Are you trying to suggest that there are a select few goalies that aren't affected by the defense?