acor
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2012
- 1,342
- 389
If a fan wants to think of the Jets 2.0 as an extension of the previous Jets, that's fine. But that doesn't mean that they're the same franchise. You can hold Hawerchuk in high regard, but Kovalchuk is the one with the records, in other words. Which is why relocated teams rarely pay any sort of homage to their previous incarnations. You don't see banners from Quebec in Colorado, or Goulet's number in the rafters. The Devils aren't rocking Scouts throwback unis. Which is all a bit of a shame, in my opinion, but I can see the reasoning for it.
Why shame ??? Kovalchuk wasn't playing for Winnipeg for a single night. Hawerchuk wasn't plaing for Phoenix Coyotes either. Hanging Kovalchuk jersey on rafters in Winnipeg would be most riddiculous thing to do IMO... And cut that "its the same franchise" bs... Yes, it is. And so what ??? "Franchise" is just a legal/paper term... In my book, there is no "Atlanta Thrashers" anymore, same as there is no "Minnesota Northstars", or "Quebec Nordiques"... Different story, different city, different colours... Even different players and owners. WHERE is the link between the former and the current ??? Its just because guy who sold you his licence to play in NHL was having his team in Quebec/Hartford/wherever ???
Last edited: