scelaton
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2012
- 3,658
- 5,612
I agree with your sentiments and have long believed in a 5 year (or so) plan, going so far as to start a thread with that title a few years ago.well my comment was specifically directed towards a poster upset that some people were getting impatient and the implication that anyone who isn't satisfied at this point is just impatient. I stated that it isn't unreasonable to expect some results by year 6 or 7. If it is, what is reasonable? Year 10? Or just keep pushing it forward a year every year.
To be clear, I'm not necessarily saying we aren't in a decent position now. But to expect the grand plan to produce results by now isn't unreasonable.
Specifically to your question - there's been some inconsistencies in the approach. We should have grabbed more draft picks (not players that were high picks, although that has been nice). We shouldn't have traded picks for veterans. We probably could have removed some of the 'core' that came with the team earlier, to accelerate the process. This has not been a flawless process, and frankly I think there has been some course corrections that have probably extended the grand plan. I give credit that many of the choices have been good. Many opportunities have been missed.
Where does your patience with the process end if it doesn't produce results? Mine should be this year, but I'm extending it to next. I hardly think that's unreasonable or impatient on my part.
Well, they made the playoffs a year ahead of schedule but then fell back last year, so I don't believe they are far off. The problem is that there is so much parity in today's NHL that there is a lot of randomness contributing to short term results--injuries, etc. The LA Kings winning the SC and missing the playoffs the next year are a good example.
The Jets and Chevy should never be judged by a standard of perfection, as no organization is perfect. In the overall scheme of things, the mistakes of which I have been openly critical have been addressed and I get the process. So, I remain patient and cautiously optimistic.
At some point soon, Chipman will hold Chevy accountable for results, but it isn't this year. That is because, as a savvy businessman, he knows that startup businesses based on a sound long-term vision often are operated at a loss for the first number of years. If the vision is sound, that is built into the business plan. And in the Jets case, the STH are implicitly co-investors in that vision by filling the seats every night.