Player Discussion: Ilya Sorokin

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kevin27NYI

Registered User
Aug 5, 2009
19,781
5,849
Very excited at this, unless this guy busts we’re set for so long now. He has franchise potential. This could propel us to contender status.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigtim1988

SI90

Registered User
Jul 25, 2011
85,601
63,142
StrongIsland
tenor.gif
 

Satan'sIsland81

Registered User
Feb 9, 2007
8,155
3,569
So he can only sign a 1 year ELC. Would be he RFA or UFA after that? Cant find this info anywhere.
 

JTToilinginToronto

Isles Fan
Jan 18, 2019
4,770
4,894
So he can only sign a 1 year ELC. Would be he RFA or UFA after that? Cant find this info anywhere.
I mean the NHL rules state that you need to be either 27 years old or have seven years of NHL experience to be an UFA after a contract expires.

So I'm not exactly sure how Sorokin would be an UFA after next season.
 

Satan'sIsland81

Registered User
Feb 9, 2007
8,155
3,569
I mean the NHL rules state that you need to be either 27 years old or have seven years of NHL experience to be an UFA after a contract expires.

So I'm not exactly sure how Sorokin would be an UFA after next season.
I am not saying he is. I am just asking for confirmation. I didnt know if there was some weird unique rule in this circumstance because the fact that he is limited to a 1 year ELC is also not a commonly seen situation.
 

JTToilinginToronto

Isles Fan
Jan 18, 2019
4,770
4,894
I am not saying he is. I am just asking for confirmation. I didnt know if there was some weird unique rule in this circumstance because the fact that he is limited to a 1 year ELC is also not a commonly seen situation.
I mean the rules seem pretty clear to me. I can't remember any other KHL players being subjected to special UFA rules in the past.
 

SI

Registered User
Feb 16, 2013
7,695
3,966
I am not saying he is. I am just asking for confirmation. I didnt know if there was some weird unique rule in this circumstance because the fact that he is limited to a 1 year ELC is also not a commonly seen situation.

He will be an RFA (100% certain) after the 1 year ELC.

Just always looking on the bright side aren’t you?
Is this your default?
 
  • Like
Reactions: xECK29x

Satan'sIsland81

Registered User
Feb 9, 2007
8,155
3,569
He will be an RFA (100% certain) after the 1 year ELC.

Just always looking on the bright side aren’t you?
Is this your default?
So now asking a totally simple honest question is cause for starting a problem. This place never changes.
 

SI

Registered User
Feb 16, 2013
7,695
3,966
So now asking a totally simple honest question is cause for starting a problem. This place never changes.

Look we have discussed the economics surrounding Sorokin for the last several seasons.

Once Sorokin signed his 3 year deal with his KHL team - the date for him to come over was THIS offseason.


There was no way he was paying to break his deal making big money (that was basically tax free) in the KHL.

One of the major advantages to signing this season (and not last season) means he only has to sign a 1 year ELC before becoming a RFA where he can make bigger money and guaranteed pro $ (a player on an ELC can be sent down and make 70k).

I am also simply pointing out that you immediately went to some negative thought process of this deal
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad