I mean the NHL rules state that you need to be either 27 years old or have seven years of NHL experience to be an UFA after a contract expires.So he can only sign a 1 year ELC. Would be he RFA or UFA after that? Cant find this info anywhere.
I am not saying he is. I am just asking for confirmation. I didnt know if there was some weird unique rule in this circumstance because the fact that he is limited to a 1 year ELC is also not a commonly seen situation.I mean the NHL rules state that you need to be either 27 years old or have seven years of NHL experience to be an UFA after a contract expires.
So I'm not exactly sure how Sorokin would be an UFA after next season.
I mean the rules seem pretty clear to me. I can't remember any other KHL players being subjected to special UFA rules in the past.I am not saying he is. I am just asking for confirmation. I didnt know if there was some weird unique rule in this circumstance because the fact that he is limited to a 1 year ELC is also not a commonly seen situation.
So he can only sign a 1 year ELC. Would be he RFA or UFA after that? Cant find this info anywhere.
Some people can stop acting like he doesn't exist now.
So he can only sign a 1 year ELC. Would be he RFA or UFA after that? Cant find this info anywhere.
I read he’ll be an RFA.So he can only sign a 1 year ELC. Would be he RFA or UFA after that? Cant find this info anywhere.
I am not saying he is. I am just asking for confirmation. I didnt know if there was some weird unique rule in this circumstance because the fact that he is limited to a 1 year ELC is also not a commonly seen situation.
So now asking a totally simple honest question is cause for starting a problem. This place never changes.He will be an RFA (100% certain) after the 1 year ELC.
Just always looking on the bright side aren’t you?
Is this your default?
So now asking a totally simple honest question is cause for starting a problem. This place never changes.