The Macho King
Back* to Back** World Champion
- Jun 22, 2011
- 48,777
- 29,312
The NHL does not care about European hockey, they are only interesting in one thing – the players. But can you imagine that if there was a transfer of leading FC Barcelona´s player to Mancherster United, the MU would pay a sum which is equal to the player´s one month salary? You even dont buy a player from Eastern Europe for such a marginal sum (in soccer – vorky). In hockey nobody has ever wanted to establish transfer rules. We have always heard only one thing – the NHL is the best and greatest league and nothing can be done. Have anybody tried to understand how it works in NBA or MLB? How much money they pay for European, Asian or Latin American players? But paying for future stars of Kuznetsov´s or Laine´s calibre a sum which is two times lower than NHL player´s minimal salary or even leaving a player (to NHL club) for „thank you“ is normal?
KHL leadership asked me a few years ago how it is possible to make a transfer of a player with valid NHL contract to Russian club. Radulov´s way of „transfer“ from Nashville to Salavat Yulaev was unacceptable of course. I was sadden then, but I studied NHL-NHL CBA for next couple of months, it is 600 pages. Then I got an idea that if a player retires from the NHL, he is free to sign in his Motherland. I called to several influential agents to consult the situation. They said me that they heard about such a scenario for the first time. I said to the KHL leadership what I found out and a half o year later, SKA signed Ilya Kovalchuk. If the people want to do something, they will do it. If they don´t want, they will not.
Are NHL clubs willing to pay for transfers?
If there are proper rules, they will. In early 90´s, when horrible things happened in Russia, the NHL clubs directly contacted Dynamo Moscow to pay solid sums, at the time, to Dynamo for their players. I remember how Ottawa paid 700 000 USD for Alexei Yashin in 1992. It was a very good sum at the time. Average NHL salary was two times lower at the time. So, NHL clubs paid money for Dynamo´s players, but CSKA´s players simply run away. How much money did NHL clubs pay to Russian clubs for Tarasenko, Panarin or Bobrovsky? I am sure, in better case, it was „thank you.“
Igor Kuperman
Former Winnipeg Jets and Phoenix Coyotes official
Original source sport-express.ru
This is all pointless though. Panarin was a FA when he came over. I assume Tarasenko and Bobrovsky were not under contract (or if they were, it contained a specific "out"-clause for the NHL).
The player ultimately decided where they wanted to play, and signed a contract to that effect. No one was breached in that way. Kovalchuk did not do that. Kovalchuk was under contract until the sun expands in New Jersey. No one put a gun to his head to sign that contract. He signed it willingly. He also would have been free to sign in SKA, in Stockholm, in Germany, in the ECHL, or any beer league in the world if he preferred. But he promised to play in New Jersey. And then he decided he wasn't going to honor that promise anymore, and went to play in the KHL instead. Comparing that to other situations is completely missing the issue.
No one cares if Nikita Nesterov plays in the KHL. He's not under contract - so happy trails. Hell, no one cares if a US or Canadian player decides to play in the KHL (other than for questions like "why the hell would they do that?" and the sheer oddity of it). As long as you're not in breach of a contract, do what you want. The leagues (or home countries or whatever) don't own the players. The teams do while they're under contract. That's it.